Suppr超能文献

睑板腺功能障碍的低强度光疗和强脉冲光疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Low-level light therapy and intense pulse light therapy in meibomian gland dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chan Kai En, Lau Beth Shin Rei, Lim Blanche Xiao Hong, Du Ruochen, Giannaccare Giuseppe, Tong Louis, Stapleton Fiona, Lim Chris Hong Long

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 Apr;48(2):102344. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.

摘要

背景

睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)是干眼疾病的主要病因,影响全球超过三分之一的人口。该疾病与眼部不适、视觉质量下降和生活质量降低有关。据报道,诸如强脉冲光(IPL)治疗和低强度光疗(LLLT)等新型治疗方法对难治性MGD治疗有效。然而,尚无系统评价探讨这两种治疗方法联合应用的效用。

方法

在Medline、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中检索关于LLLT + IPL治疗MGD的文章。进行单均值的荟萃分析以评估临床终点。

结果

对12项研究的分析表明,MGD患者接受LLLT + IPL治疗后,眼表疾病指数评分显著降低(MD:-22.8,95%CI:-29.1至-16.5,I² = 97.5%,p < 0.001),泪膜破裂时间(MD:2.2秒,95%CI:0.9秒至3.4秒,I² = 98.6%,p < 0.001)和泪液分泌试验(MD:1.5毫米,95%CI:0.6毫米至2.5毫米,I² = 0.0%,p = 0.001)在治疗后≤3个月均显著增加。在治疗后≥6个月的敏感性分析中,这些改善得以维持。虽然据报道睑板腺面积减少的百分比(n = 4,MD:-3.8%,95%CI:-7.2%至-0.4%,I² = 40.0%,p = 0.031)显著降低,但在两项研究中,在治疗后≥6个月的终点时未发现这种情况持续存在(n = 2,MD:5.9%,95%CI:1.8%至10.0%,I² = 0.0%,p = 0.005)。

结论

这项荟萃分析提供了定量证据,支持LLLT + IPL治疗MGD的临床疗效。未来的研究应评估其长期安全性和疗效,并与其他治疗方法进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验