Suppr超能文献

用于预测通过救护车送往急诊科患者院内死亡率的修订版快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(RqSOFA)的特征:一项观察性队列研究

Characteristics of a revised quick sequential organ failure assessment score (RqSOFA) to predict in-hospital mortality of patients visiting the emergency department via ambulance: an observational cohort study.

作者信息

Kamikawa Yohei, Hayashi Hiroyuki, Bone Jeffrey N, Goldman Ran D

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan.

Clinical Research Support Unit, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y.

Abstract

The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) are scoring systems that rely on vital signs. However, NEWS is time-consuming, qSOFA has low sensitivity, and MqSOFA includes a difficult calculation. To address these issues, we developed the Revised qSOFA score (RqSOFA) that consists of percutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygen usage, Simple Shock Index, and the parameters of qSOFA. The predictability of RqSOFA was examined for in-hospital mortality among patients who were transported by ambulance. This observational cohort study included all patients transported via ambulance to an Emergency Department between 2019 and 2021. Patients who had prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, were pregnant, were younger than 15 years old, arrived from another hospital, and had missing data were excluded. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of RqSOFA, as well as its sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point, were determined and compared to those of qSOFA, NEWS and MqSOFA. Among 1849 included patients, 53 died in the hospital. The AUROC for RqSOFA was 0.867 and the optimal cut-off point was 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.849 and 0.802, respectively. The AUROC of RqSOFA was larger than qSOFA but had no significance with NEWS and MqSOFA. RqSOFA exhibited the same sensitivity and better specificity compared to NEWS. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity between RqSOFA and MqSOFA. In conclusion, RqSOFA exhibited superior predictability for in-hospital mortality to qSOFA and NEWS, while offering similar predictability to MqSOFA despite relying only on simple measurements.

摘要

国家早期预警评分(NEWS)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和改良qSOFA(MqSOFA)是依赖生命体征的评分系统。然而,NEWS耗时,qSOFA敏感性低,且MqSOFA包含复杂计算。为解决这些问题,我们开发了修订的qSOFA评分(RqSOFA),它由经皮血氧饱和度、氧耗量、简易休克指数和qSOFA的参数组成。我们检验了RqSOFA对经救护车转运患者院内死亡率的预测能力。这项观察性队列研究纳入了2019年至2021年间经救护车转运至急诊科的所有患者。排除了院前发生心肺骤停、怀孕、年龄小于15岁、从其他医院转来以及有缺失数据的患者。确定了RqSOFA的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)及其在最佳切点处的敏感性和特异性,并与qSOFA、NEWS和MqSOFA进行比较。在1849例纳入患者中,53例在医院死亡。RqSOFA的AUROC为0.867,最佳切点为2。敏感性和特异性分别为0.849和0.802。RqSOFA的AUROC大于qSOFA,但与NEWS和MqSOFA相比无显著差异。与NEWS相比,RqSOFA表现出相同的敏感性和更好的特异性。RqSOFA和MqSOFA在敏感性和特异性方面无差异。总之,RqSOFA对院内死亡率的预测能力优于qSOFA和NEWS,尽管仅依赖简单测量,但与MqSOFA具有相似的预测能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验