• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用Flatiron Health数据库分析高危和非高危冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤患者的真实世界特征及预后

Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with high-risk and non-high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma using the Flatiron Health database.

作者信息

Rajkumar S Vincent, Mateos María-Victoria, Schaeffer Marcy, Lin Xiwu, Bathija Sacheeta, Gupta-Werner Niodita, Lam Annette, Carson Robin, Dennis Robyn, Kaila Shuchita, Matt Kathryn, Duran Joana, Lonial Sagar

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Blood Cancer J. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):215. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01170-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41408-024-01170-z
PMID:39638995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11621302/
Abstract

This study aimed to provide real-world evidence on progression risk in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). This retrospective, observational study leveraged data from the Flatiron Health database. Eligible patients had SMM and relevant measures to apply Mayo 2018, International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2020, and AQUILA trial risk criteria. Time to progression to active MM (TTP), progression or death (PFS), and death or progression on first-line MM therapy (PFS2) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and time from SMM diagnosis to risk classification date. Across the three risk models (Mayo 2018, IMWG 2020, and AQUILA trial), high-risk patients with SMM had 3.0-4.0 times the risk of TTP, 2.1-3.5 times the risk of PFS, and 1.7-3.2 times the risk of PFS2 versus non-high-risk patients (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similar results were observed when patients with early treatment, early progression, and/or bone disease were excluded. This study demonstrates that high-risk patients with SMM have worse prognoses than non-high-risk patients, regardless of the criteria used, and highlights a need for early intervention testing.

摘要

本研究旨在提供关于高危冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤(SMM)患者疾病进展风险的真实世界证据。这项回顾性观察性研究利用了Flatiron Health数据库中的数据。符合条件的患者患有SMM,并采用了相关指标来应用梅奥2018版、国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)2020版以及AQUILA试验的风险标准。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和多变量Cox回归模型评估进展为活动性骨髓瘤的时间(TTP)、进展或死亡(PFS)以及一线骨髓瘤治疗中的死亡或进展(PFS2),模型针对年龄、Charlson合并症指数以及从SMM诊断到风险分类日期的时间进行了调整。在三种风险模型(梅奥2018版、IMWG 2020版和AQUILA试验)中,与非高危患者相比,高危SMM患者的TTP风险高3.0至4.0倍,PFS风险高2.1至3.5倍,PFS2风险高1.7至3.2倍(所有比较的p值均<0.001)。排除早期治疗、早期进展和/或骨病患者后,观察到了类似结果。本研究表明,无论使用何种标准,高危SMM患者的预后均比非高危患者差,并强调了早期干预检测的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/04df67094ac0/41408_2024_1170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/ce20cff8c97e/41408_2024_1170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/357c8795dfd3/41408_2024_1170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/04df67094ac0/41408_2024_1170_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/ce20cff8c97e/41408_2024_1170_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/357c8795dfd3/41408_2024_1170_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee88/11621302/04df67094ac0/41408_2024_1170_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with high-risk and non-high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma using the Flatiron Health database.利用Flatiron Health数据库分析高危和非高危冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤患者的真实世界特征及预后
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):215. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01170-z.
2
Evaluating early intervention in smoldering myeloma clinical trials: a systematic review.评估冒烟型骨髓瘤临床试验中的早期干预:一项系统综述
Oncologist. 2025 Feb 6;30(2). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae219.
3
Early Intervention With a Curative Intent Through an Intensive Therapy Versus Immunologic Disease Control Using a Minimal Intensity Approach in the Management of High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Evidence From Clinical Trials.高危冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤治疗中采用强化治疗(有治愈意向的早期干预)与采用最低强度治疗方案(免疫疾病控制)的对比:来自临床试验的证据的系统评价。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Jan;23(1):e27-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
4
Comparison of outcomes with elranatamab and real world treatments in the UK for triple class exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.在英国,elranatamab与现实世界中针对三重暴露复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤的治疗结果比较。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 25;25(1):1219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14624-9.
5
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.双膦酸盐类药物在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:一项更新的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):CD003188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Early versus deferred treatment for early stage multiple myeloma.早期多发性骨髓瘤的早期治疗与延迟治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD004023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004023.
8
Multiple myeloma care, treatment patterns, and treatment durations in academic and community care settings.学术及社区医疗环境中的多发性骨髓瘤护理、治疗模式及治疗持续时间。
Future Oncol. 2025 Jun;21(15):1905-1918. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2504318. Epub 2025 May 21.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and outcomes in risk-stratified patients with smoldering multiple myeloma: data from the Czech Republic Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies.分层风险多发性骨髓瘤冒烟型患者的临床特征和结局:来自捷克骨髓瘤单克隆丙种球蛋白血症登记处的数据。
Blood Cancer J. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00906-7.
2
The consultant's guide to smoldering multiple myeloma.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤的顾问指南。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022 Dec 9;2022(1):551-559. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2022000355.
3
Smoldering multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms.
冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤现行治疗方案。
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Sep 5;12(9):129. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00719-0.
4
Genetic subtypes of smoldering multiple myeloma are associated with distinct pathogenic phenotypes and clinical outcomes.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤的遗传亚型与不同的发病表型和临床结局相关。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 15;13(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30694-w.
5
How I approach smoldering multiple myeloma.我是如何处理冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤的。
Blood. 2022 Aug 25;140(8):828-838. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011670.
6
Risk stratified management approaches for smouldering multiple myeloma: clinical research becomes clinical practice.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤的风险分层管理方法:临床研究转化为临床实践。
Lancet Haematol. 2022 Feb;9(2):e162-e165. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00335-5.
7
Smoldering multiple myeloma: evolving diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤:不断演变的诊断标准与治疗策略。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):673-681. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2021000304.
8
Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis.评估冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤风险分层评分在诊断后连续应用的预后效用。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):186. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00569-2.
9
Assessment of Discordance Among Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Risk Models.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤风险模型间不吻合的评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):132-134. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5585.
10
International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).国际骨髓瘤工作组冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤(SMM)的风险分层模型。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):102. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3.