• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MP1000手术系统在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究。

Safety and efficacy of the MP1000 surgical system in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A prospective study.

作者信息

Ai Qing, Zhao Xupeng, Jiang Bin, Cheng Qiang, Lu Yin, Tang Jinlu, Feng Yi, Tang Lu, Zhang Xu, Li Hongzhao

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China.

School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

出版信息

Bladder (San Franc). 2024 Nov 6;11(3):e21200013. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0026. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.14440/bladder.2024.0026
PMID:39640189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11617064/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has become widely adopted due to its numerous advantages, with the da Vinci robotic surgical system being the most commonly used across the globe. However, the high cost limits its broader application.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing RARC using the more economical MP1000 surgical system.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, single-blind study, 21 patients scheduled for RARC between April and June 2024 were randomly assigned to undergo surgery with either the da Vinci Si system or the MP1000 system. The primary outcome was the rate of conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes included robotic arm installation time, total surgery duration, intraoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative positive margin rate, length of post-operative hospital stay, and short-term post-operative complications.

RESULTS

All surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open or laparoscopic procedures, and no intraoperative complications related to robotic mechanical failure were observed. The robotic arm installation time was slightly longer with the MP1000 system compared to the da Vinci Si system (20.75 vs. 17.13 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative positive margin rate, post-operative hospital stay, or short-term post-operative complications. In addition, there was no significant difference in National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores, a measure of the operator workload. The primary limitation of this study was its small sample size.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the MP1000 surgical system was a safe, feasible, and effective alternative for RARC, and achieved comparable outcomes to the da Vinci Si system.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)因其诸多优势已被广泛采用,其中达芬奇机器人手术系统在全球最为常用。然而,高昂的成本限制了其更广泛的应用。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用更经济的MP1000手术系统进行RARC的安全性和有效性。

方法

在这项前瞻性、单中心、单盲研究中,将2024年4月至6月计划进行RARC的21例患者随机分配,分别接受达芬奇Si系统或MP1000系统的手术。主要结局是转为开放手术或腹腔镜手术的比例。次要结局包括机器人手臂安装时间、总手术时长、术中并发症、术中失血量、术后切缘阳性率、术后住院时间以及术后短期并发症。

结果

所有手术均成功完成,未转为开放或腹腔镜手术,未观察到与机器人机械故障相关的术中并发症。与达芬奇Si系统相比,MP1000系统的机器人手臂安装时间略长(20.75分钟对17.13分钟,P<0.001)。两组在手术时长、术中失血量、术后切缘阳性率、术后住院时间或术后短期并发症方面无统计学显著差异。此外,在衡量操作者工作量的美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数评分方面也无显著差异。本研究的主要局限性是样本量小。

结论

该研究表明,MP1000手术系统是RARC的一种安全、可行且有效的替代方案,其结果与达芬奇Si系统相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7545/11617064/ebdc0688e6c5/bladder-11-e21200013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7545/11617064/cfacd1061ad6/bladder-11-e21200013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7545/11617064/ebdc0688e6c5/bladder-11-e21200013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7545/11617064/cfacd1061ad6/bladder-11-e21200013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7545/11617064/ebdc0688e6c5/bladder-11-e21200013-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of the MP1000 surgical system in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A prospective study.MP1000手术系统在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
Bladder (San Franc). 2024 Nov 6;11(3):e21200013. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0026. eCollection 2024.
2
Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.MP1000平台用于机器人辅助前列腺切除术的适用性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Apr 25;64:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial.MP1000 系统用于机器人辅助部分肾切除术的适宜性:一项多中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2803-2809. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001166.
4
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Chinese surgical systems KangDuo-SR-2000 and EDGE MP1000 versus the Da Vinci Xi system: a prospective, single-center, non-randomized clinical trial.使用中国手术系统康多-SR-2000和EDGE MP1000与达芬奇Xi系统进行机器人辅助部分肾切除术和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项前瞻性、单中心、非随机临床试验。
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 2;43(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05593-6.
5
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
6
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
8
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
9
Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.从达芬奇 Si 到 Xi:在高容量机器人中心评估手术结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3737-3744. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04665-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
The Impact of Previous Prostate Surgery on Surgical Outcomes for Patients Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.前列腺手术史对接受机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术患者手术结局的影响。
Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):358-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemotherapeutic dihydromyricetin with remarkable anti-tumor activity and biosafety for muscle invasive bladder cancer.具有显著抗肿瘤活性且对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌具有生物安全性的化疗药物二氢杨梅素。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1609354. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1609354. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.MP1000平台用于机器人辅助前列腺切除术的适用性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Apr 25;64:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial.MP1000 系统用于机器人辅助部分肾切除术的适宜性:一项多中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2803-2809. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001166.
3
Inpatient Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A National Inpatient Sample Database Study.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的住院患者结局:一项全国住院患者样本数据库研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):772. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030772.
4
Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted total cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Asian J Surg. 2024 Apr;47(4):2028-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.035. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Safety and Reliability of a Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Telesurgery System: Expanding Indications in Urological Surgery.机器人辅助腹腔镜远程手术系统的安全性与可靠性:泌尿外科手术适应症的拓展
Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):506-507. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
6
Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis.森恩希(Senhance)机器人与达芬奇(da Vinci)机器人根治性前列腺切除术的比较:短期疗效、学习曲线和成本分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):116-121. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00717-8. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy for Patients With Bladder Cancer.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的成本效益比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317255. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17255.
8
Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公立医疗体系中多专科机器人辅助手术的手术结果和成本分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01643-6. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
9
Perioperative comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical cystectomy: An update meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Sep;46(9):3464-3479. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.04.030. Epub 2023 May 13.
10
The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Urinary Tract Tumors.《2022 年世界卫生组织泌尿系统及男性生殖器官肿瘤分类-第 B 部分:前列腺和泌尿系统肿瘤》。
Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):469-482. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.