Stevenson Kerrie, Edwards Samuel, Ogunlana Kemi, Alomari Maha, Agoropopoola Rukayat, Henderson William, Clemente Nuria Sanchez, Rayment-Jones Hannah, McGranahan Majel, Castaner Maria Marti, Luchenski Serena, Fellmeth Gracia, Stevenson Fiona, Knight Marian, Aldridge Robert
Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 19;78:102938. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102938. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Migrant women who are pregnant or postpartum and their infants are often at increased risk of poorer perinatal outcomes compared to host country populations. This review aimed to identify public health, policy, and clinical interventions to improve maternity care for migrant women and their infants in high-income countries (HICs).
In this systematic review we searched EMBASE, EMCARE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and grey literature from inception to 13th March 2024, with no language or date restrictions (PROSPERO: CRD42022380678). Interventional and observational studies assessing the effectiveness of any intervention to improve perinatal care for migrant women and their infants in HICs delivered in the pregnancy, peripartum, or postpartum period (up to one year after birth) were included. Quantitative outcomes were extracted. Qualitative studies were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using Harvest plots and binomial exact calculations.
15,689 records were retrieved, 29 studies comprising data from 16,763,837 women were included. 22 studies (75.9%) included multiple interventions. Five interventions had strong evidence of effectiveness. Two clinical interventions: 100.0% of studies including specialist multidisciplinary teams improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest, namely preterm birth, birthweight, and appointment attendance (95% confidence interval 73.5-100.0%; p < 0.001); and 90.9% of studies including specialist in-person interpreting improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest (58.7-100.0%; p = 0.012). Three public health or policy interventions: 100.0% of social welfare interventions (75.3%-100.0%; p < 0.001) improved one or more of the main outcomes of interest; 100.0% of maternal education interventions (71.5-100.0%. p < 0.001), and 83.3% of studies assessing access to free healthcare (51.6-97.9%; p = 0.039).
The findings suggest that multicomponent interventions comprising multidisciplinary teams, in-person interpreting, maternal education, and social welfare support can improve perinatal outcomes for migrant women and their infants. Removing financial barriers to care may improve perinatal outcomes and be cost saving to healthcare systems. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given that most included studies were of poor quality and that sensitivity analysis restricting to interventional studies only did not demonstrate any effect on the main outcomes of interest.
KS is supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR302577). HRJ is supported by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR303183). HRJ is supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London. MM is supported by a Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant number MR/W01498X/1). GF is supported by a Nuffield Department of Population Health Clinical Research Fellowship. MK is an NIHR Senior Investigator (NIHR303806). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
与东道国人口相比,怀孕或产后的移民妇女及其婴儿出现围产期结局较差的风险往往更高。本综述旨在确定公共卫生、政策和临床干预措施,以改善高收入国家(HICs)移民妇女及其婴儿的孕产妇保健。
在本系统综述中,我们检索了EMBASE、EMCARE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CENTRAL、Scopus、CINAHL Plus、Web of Science以及截至2024年3月13日的灰色文献,无语言或日期限制(PROSPERO:CRD42022380678)。纳入评估任何干预措施在孕期、围产期或产后(出生后一年内)改善HICs中移民妇女及其婴儿围产期护理有效性的干预性和观察性研究。提取定量结果。排除定性研究。主要关注的结局是早产、出生体重和预约就诊情况。使用Harvest图和二项式精确计算进行定量综合分析。
检索到15689条记录,纳入29项研究,涉及16763837名妇女的数据。22项研究(75.9%)包括多种干预措施。五项干预措施有强有力的有效性证据。两项临床干预措施:100.0%纳入专科多学科团队的研究改善了一项或多项主要关注结局,即早产、出生体重和预约就诊情况(95%置信区间73.5 - 100.0%;p < 0.001);90.9%纳入专科现场口译的研究改善了一项或多项主要关注结局(58.7 - 100.0%;p = 0.012)。三项公共卫生或政策干预措施:100.0%的社会福利干预措施(75.3% - 100.0%;p < 0.001)改善了一项或多项主要关注结局;100.0%的孕产妇教育干预措施(71.5 - 100.0%,p < 0.001),以及83.3%评估免费医疗可及性(51.6 - 97.9%;p = 0.039)的研究。
研究结果表明,由多学科团队、现场口译、孕产妇教育和社会福利支持组成的多成分干预措施可改善移民妇女及其婴儿的围产期结局。消除医疗护理的经济障碍可能改善围产期结局,并为医疗保健系统节省成本。然而,鉴于大多数纳入研究质量较差,且仅限制于干预性研究的敏感性分析未显示对主要关注结局有任何影响,这些结果应谨慎解读。
KS由国家卫生研究院(NIHR)博士奖学金(NIHR302577)资助。HRJ由NIHR高级奖学金(NIHR303183)资助。HRJ由NIHR应用研究合作组织(ARC)南伦敦分会资助。MM由医学研究理事会临床研究培训奖学金(资助编号MR/W01498X/1)资助。GF由纳菲尔德人口健康系临床研究奖学金资助。MK是NIHR高级研究员(NIHR303806)。所表达的观点是作者的观点,不一定是NIHR或卫生与社会保健部的观点。