Suppr超能文献

社会经济剥夺对妊娠期糖尿病患病率的影响:一项观察性研究。

The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the prevalence of gestational diabetes: An observational study.

作者信息

Gnanasambanthan Sai, Jabak Salma, Mohan Retika, Dayoub Nawal, Maduanusi Chiamaka, Kohli Shuchi, Haas-Heger Tabea, Lynch Calum, Hameed Aisha

机构信息

Princess Royal University Hospital, London, UK.

Kings College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Obstet Med. 2024 Dec;17(4):201-207. doi: 10.1177/1753495X231213920. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3.5% of pregnancies in the United Kingdom are complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Risk factors for this mirror those contributing to type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Though socioeconomic status (SES) is presumed to contribute to GDM, evidence in the United Kingdom is limited. In this unique study, we explored the impact of SES on GDM prevalence in a London suburb population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four thousand one hundred and sixty-three pregnant women who booked between July 2018 and March 2020 at Princess Royal University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between GDM prevalence and SES trends (using multiple deprivation deciles (MDD)), and body mass index (BMI), age, ethnicity, screening uptake, birth-weights and birth outcomes, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with BMI >30 kg/m, older than 35 years, and non-Caucasian ethnicity have an increased risk of developing GDM ( < 0.0001,  < 0.0001,  < 0.0001, respectively). No association existed between MDD and GDM prevalence (-values over 0.05). Patients with risk factors for GDM were highest in the deprived areas  < 0.0001. MDD 1-4 (most deprived) had the highest percentage of missed screening (15% of patients with risk factors missed screening), compared to 8% in the least deprived group ( < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Our data surprisingly suggest that low SES did not increase the incidence of GDM, despite a higher proportion of women with risk factors for GDM living in the most deprived postcodes. However this unclear finding may be due to low screening uptake of deprived populations, and therefore lack of GDM diagnosis, or indicate that GDM is a result of a different aetiology to T2DM. Further research is needed to explore if access to screening services, lack of health education or other health inequalities were responsible for the high proportion of missed screening opportunities in deprived areas.

摘要

背景

在英国,约3.5%的妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)。其风险因素与2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险因素相似。尽管社会经济地位(SES)被认为与GDM有关,但英国的相关证据有限。在这项独特的研究中,我们探讨了SES对伦敦郊区人群中GDM患病率的影响。

材料与方法

对2018年7月至2020年3月期间在皇家公主大学医院预约就诊的4163名孕妇进行回顾性分析。分析了GDM患病率与SES趋势(使用多重贫困十分位数(MDD))、体重指数(BMI)、年龄、种族、筛查接受情况、出生体重和出生结局之间的关联。

结果

BMI>30kg/m、年龄大于35岁以及非白种人种族的患者患GDM的风险增加(分别为<0.0001、<0.0001、<0.0001)。MDD与GDM患病率之间无关联(P值大于0.05)。GDM风险因素患者在贫困地区的比例最高(<0.0001)。MDD 1 - 4组(最贫困)错过筛查的比例最高(15%有风险因素的患者错过筛查),而最不贫困组为8%(<0.0001)。

讨论

我们的数据令人惊讶地表明,尽管生活在最贫困邮政编码地区的GDM风险因素女性比例较高,但低SES并未增加GDM的发病率。然而,这一不明确的发现可能是由于贫困人群的筛查接受率低,因此缺乏GDM诊断,或者表明GDM的病因与T2DM不同。需要进一步研究以探讨获得筛查服务的机会、缺乏健康教育或其他健康不平等是否是贫困地区错过筛查机会比例高的原因。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Ethnic Disparities in Gestational Diabetes.种族差异与妊娠糖尿病。
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jul 23;18(9):68. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1040-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验