Aslan Tuğrul, Esim Emir, Üstün Yakup
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Turhan Baytop Street, No:1, Yenidoğan District, 38280, Talas, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Erciyes University Faculty of Engineering, Kayseri, Turkey.
Odontology. 2024 Dec 6. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01029-6.
This study evaluates the stress distribution in mandibular molar teeth with external cervical resorption restored using various restorative and biomimetic materials through finite element analysis. A mandibular first molar was scanned to create a 3D model. 'Class 2Bp' external cervical resorption defects were simulated on the buccal aspect and restored with different materials. Composite resin or highly viscous glass ionomer cement restored the coronal portion, while mineral-trioxide-aggregate, Biodentine, BioAggregate, or glass-ionomer cement filled the radicular portion. Models representing unrestored external cervical resorption and intact teeth were also created. Access cavities were restored with composite resin in all models except the intact tooth model. This computational simulation study used finite element analysis (ANSYS) to assess stress distribution in mandibular molars with external cervical resorption. A 300 N oblique force, directed buccally at a 45° angle, was applied to simulate masticatory forces, and von Mises stresses were evaluated in the resorption regions to compare materials' performance in terms of stress concentration and tooth integrity. Similar stress distributions were observed when restoring the coronal portion with composite resin or highly-viscous glass ionomer cement. Stress decreased with mineral-trioxide-aggregate or glass-ionomer cement in the radicular portion compared to Biodentine and BioAggregate. Restored and intact tooth models experienced lower stresses than unrestored tooth. All tested models were considered safe, except the unrestored external cervical resorption model. Restored external cervical resorption models are generally safe; however, using mineral-trioxide-aggregate or glass-ionomer cement in the radicular portion may slightly reduce stress in external cervical resorption regions.
本研究通过有限元分析评估使用各种修复材料和仿生材料修复的下颌磨牙伴外吸收时的应力分布。扫描一颗下颌第一磨牙以创建三维模型。在颊侧模拟“2Bp类”外吸收缺损,并用不同材料修复。复合树脂或高粘性玻璃离子水门汀修复冠部,而三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物陶瓷、生物聚合体或玻璃离子水门汀填充根部。还创建了代表未修复外吸收和完整牙齿的模型。除完整牙齿模型外,所有模型的进入洞均用复合树脂修复。本计算模拟研究使用有限元分析(ANSYS)评估下颌磨牙伴外吸收时的应力分布。施加一个300N的斜向力,以45°角向颊侧方向施加,以模拟咀嚼力,并评估吸收区域的冯·米塞斯应力,以比较材料在应力集中和牙齿完整性方面的性能。用复合树脂或高粘性玻璃离子水门汀修复冠部时观察到相似的应力分布。与生物陶瓷和生物聚合体相比,根部用三氧化矿物凝聚体或玻璃离子水门汀时应力降低。修复后的牙齿模型和完整牙齿模型的应力低于未修复的牙齿。除未修复的外吸收模型外,所有测试模型均被认为是安全的。修复后的外吸收模型总体上是安全的;然而,在根部使用三氧化矿物凝聚体或玻璃离子水门汀可能会略微降低外吸收区域的应力。