Valcarcel Bryan, Savage Kerry J, Link Brian K, Leonard John P, Kelly Kara M, Thanarajasingam Gita, Cerhan James R, Pro Barbara, Gordon Leo I, Thompson Carrie A, Smith Sonali M, Morton Lindsay M
Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, The University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun;21(6):801-812. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00364. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases that develop in individuals of all ages and have variable prognoses. Improved survival resulting from therapy advances has led to the emergence of diverse late effects. Although several (US)-based organizations have developed survivorship guidelines, the distinct features of lymphoma subtypes and diverse therapies used raise concerns regarding their applicability to lymphoma survivors. We compared survivorship recommendations (outside primary disease monitoring) between US clinical guidelines.
We extracted information from 17 guidelines from five US-based organizations: ASCO (n = 11), American Cancer Society (n = 1), Children's Oncology Group (n = 1), Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (n = 1), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (n = 3). Guidelines were evaluated to determine whether they offer recommendations on , (), and . Comparisons were focused on second primary malignancy, cardiovascular complications, and vaccination.
Survivorship recommendations on and mainly differ in the timing and approaches for screening. Vaccination recommendations were primarily derived from other cancer populations. Identified research gaps were a lack of understanding of the risk of late effects across lymphoma subtypes, the role of social determinants of health in survivorship, and the lack of a survivorship care model that integrates lymphoma subtypes and treatment exposures.
This study raises awareness about the complexity and challenges of managing survivors under the umbrella diagnosis of lymphoma. The inconsistency and incompleteness of existing guidelines may lead to suboptimal survivorship care. We propose expert-based research priorities to address gaps and unmet needs to help develop risk-based follow-up recommendations to optimize survivorship care for lymphoma survivors.
淋巴瘤是一组异质性疾病,可发生于各年龄段个体,预后各异。治疗进展带来的生存改善导致了多种迟发效应的出现。尽管一些(美国)组织已制定了生存指南,但淋巴瘤亚型的独特特征和所采用的多种治疗方法引发了对其适用于淋巴瘤幸存者的担忧。我们比较了美国临床指南之间的生存建议(不包括原发性疾病监测)。
我们从美国五个组织的17项指南中提取了信息:美国临床肿瘤学会(11项)、美国癌症协会(1项)、儿童肿瘤学组(1项)、国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(1项)以及国家综合癌症网络(3项)。对指南进行评估,以确定它们是否就[具体内容未给出]、[具体内容未给出]和[具体内容未给出]提供建议。比较重点在于第二原发性恶性肿瘤、心血管并发症和疫苗接种。
关于[具体内容未给出]和[具体内容未给出]的生存建议主要在筛查时间和方法上存在差异。疫苗接种建议主要源自其他癌症人群。确定的研究空白包括对淋巴瘤各亚型迟发效应风险缺乏了解、健康的社会决定因素在生存中的作用以及缺乏整合淋巴瘤亚型和治疗暴露情况的生存护理模式。
本研究提高了对淋巴瘤总体诊断下管理幸存者的复杂性和挑战的认识。现有指南的不一致性和不完整性可能导致生存护理效果欠佳。我们提出基于专家的研究重点,以填补空白和满足未满足的需求,帮助制定基于风险的随访建议,以优化淋巴瘤幸存者的生存护理。