Suppr超能文献

中国、英国、印度、墨西哥、南非和美国老年人群中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的跨国统计协调。

Cross-national statistical harmonization of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale among older adults in China, England, India, Mexico, South Africa, and the United States.

作者信息

Yu Xuexin, Jones Richard N, Kobayashi Lindsay C, Gross Alden L

机构信息

Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;178:111623. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111623. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined differential item functioning (DIF) of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) items by country and statistically harmonized common cross-national factor scores for the CES-D to aid further cross-national research.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Data were from Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) studies in China (N = 9639), England (N = 1262), India (N = 4048), Mexico (N = 1918), South Africa (N = 631), and the United States (N = 3321). Multiple indicators, multiple causes models were estimated to test DIF in the CES-D items by country. DIF items were defined as having an odds ratio (OR) outside the range of 0.75-1.25 in multiple indicators, multiple causes models. We evaluated DIF impact and identified salient DIF by examining whether the difference between DIF-adjusted factor scores and non-DIF-adjusted factor scores exceeded a threshold of 0.30 standard deviation (SD) units. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to create DIF-adjusted, cross-nationally harmonized CES-D factor scores.

RESULTS

Controlling for underlying depressive symptoms, HCAP participants in India had higher odds of reporting being not hopeful about future (OR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-1.42), not enjoying life (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.38-1.48), and being unhappy (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.25-1.34), compared to HCAP participants in the United States. These identified DIF items artificially increased mean harmonized CES-D factor scores by 0.48 SD units in the India HCAP, with over 50% of the factor scores increased by over 0.30 SD units, indicating salient DIF in the India HCAP.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate cross-national heterogeneity in the expression of depressive symptoms. We provide DIF-adjusted CES-D factor scores to improve the quality of cross-national comparisons in aging research.

摘要

目的

我们按国家对流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)项目的差异项目功能(DIF)进行了检查,并对CES-D的通用跨国因子得分进行了统计协调,以助力进一步的跨国研究。

研究设计与背景

数据来自中国(N = 9639)、英国(N = 1262)、印度(N = 4048)、墨西哥(N = 1918)、南非(N = 631)和美国(N = 3321)的统一认知评估协议(HCAP)研究。估计了多指标多原因模型,以按国家检验CES-D项目中的DIF。DIF项目被定义为在多指标多原因模型中优势比(OR)超出0.75 - 1.25范围。我们通过检查DIF调整后的因子得分与非DIF调整后的因子得分之间的差异是否超过0.30标准差(SD)单位,来评估DIF影响并确定显著的DIF。使用验证性因子分析来创建DIF调整后的、跨国协调的CES-D因子得分。

结果

在控制潜在抑郁症状的情况下,与美国的HCAP参与者相比,印度的HCAP参与者报告对未来不抱有希望(OR = 1.38,95%置信区间[CI]:1.34 - 1.42)、不享受生活(OR = 1.43,95% CI:1.38 - 1.48)以及不开心(OR = 1.29,95% CI:1.25 - 1.34)的几率更高。这些确定的DIF项目在印度HCAP中人为地使平均协调后的CES-D因子得分提高了0.48 SD单位,超过50%的因子得分提高了超过0.30 SD单位,表明印度HCAP中存在显著的DIF。

结论

我们的研究结果表明抑郁症状表达存在跨国异质性。我们提供了DIF调整后的CES-D因子得分,以提高衰老研究中跨国比较的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验