Cohen J L, Sauter S V, deVellis R F, deVellis B M
Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Mar;29(3):388-93. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290312.
We compared the relative effectiveness of 2 arthritis patient education interventions. One intervention was modeled after that developed by Lorig, whereas the other had similar content but used health professionals rather than laypersons as instructors. Both interventions resulted in an increase in patients' knowledge of arthritis and in their use of exercise compared with a control group that received no intervention. However, neither intervention was any more effective than nonintervention in lessening patients' pain, improving their functioning, enhancing social support systems, lessening their depression, or improving their health behaviors beyond that of exercise. No differences in outcome measures were found between groups led by professional instructors and those led by lay instructors.
我们比较了两种关节炎患者教育干预措施的相对有效性。一种干预措施是仿照Lorig开发的措施制定的,而另一种干预措施内容相似,但使用卫生专业人员而非外行人作为指导者。与未接受任何干预的对照组相比,这两种干预措施均使患者对关节炎的了解以及运动的使用有所增加。然而,在减轻患者疼痛、改善其功能、增强社会支持系统、减轻其抑郁或改善其除运动以外的健康行为方面,这两种干预措施并不比不干预更有效。由专业指导者带领的小组和由外行人指导者带领的小组在结果指标上未发现差异。