Sato Satsuki, Irie Koichiro, Mochida Yuki, Hirata Takahisa, Azuma Tetsuji, Iwai Komei, Yonenaga Takatoshi, Sasai Yasuyuki, Tomofuji Takaaki, Kamata Yohei, Komaki Motohiro, Yamamoto Tatsuo
Department of Periodontology, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-Cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Preventive Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-Cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 238-8580, Japan.
Odontology. 2024 Dec 6. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01035-8.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LD) levels, assessed using a test kit, and the community periodontal index (CPI) and to determine the feasibility and reliability of the test kit for screening periodontal disease in adults. The study included 205 patients (58.5% female, median and 25-75 percentiles of age 55.0, 46.0-66.0 years) who visited two university hospitals and one university clinic in Japan. Resting saliva sample was collected from each participant, and LD level was evaluated in real time using a kit featuring an integer scale ranging from 1 to 10. Individual pocket scores were categorized as follows: score = 0 (≤ 3 mm), score = 1 (4-5 mm), and score = 2 (≥ 6 mm) and gingival bleeding scores were categorized as follows: score = 0 (absence of condition) and score = 1 (presence of condition). Notably, 120 participants (58.5%) exhibited a pocket score = 1 or 2, and 123 participants (60.0%) exhibited a gingival bleeding score = 1. The optimal cutoff values for salivary LD level to distinguish pocket scores = 1 or 2 from 0 and score = 2 from 0 or 1 were 4.0 and 5.0, respectively, with a sensitivity and specificity of ≥ 0.65. The median salivary LD level for a gingival score = 1 was significantly higher than that for gingival score = 0, and the optimal cutoff value for the salivary LD level was 4.0, with a sensitivity and specificity of ≥ 0.62. Our results suggested that a salivary LD level ≥ 4.0 in adults may suggest the presence of periodontal disease, thereby emphasizing the kit`s utility as a screening tool.
本研究旨在调查使用检测试剂盒评估的唾液乳酸脱氢酶(LD)水平与社区牙周指数(CPI)之间的关联,并确定该检测试剂盒用于筛查成人牙周疾病的可行性和可靠性。该研究纳入了205名患者(女性占58.5%,年龄中位数为55.0岁,25 - 75百分位数为46.0 - 66.0岁),他们就诊于日本的两家大学医院和一家大学诊所。从每位参与者收集静息唾液样本,并使用具有1至10整数评分范围的试剂盒实时评估LD水平。个体牙周袋评分分类如下:评分 = 0(≤3毫米),评分 = 1(4 - 5毫米),评分 = 2(≥6毫米);牙龈出血评分分类如下:评分 = 0(无此情况),评分 = 1(有此情况)。值得注意的是,120名参与者(58.5%)的牙周袋评分为1或2,123名参与者(60.0%)的牙龈出血评分为1。将牙周袋评分 = 1或2与0区分开以及将评分 = 2与0或1区分开的唾液LD水平的最佳临界值分别为4.0和5.0,敏感性和特异性≥0.65。牙龈评分为1时的唾液LD水平中位数显著高于牙龈评分为0时,唾液LD水平的最佳临界值为4.0,敏感性和特异性≥0.62。我们的结果表明,成人唾液LD水平≥4.0可能提示存在牙周疾病,从而强调了该试剂盒作为筛查工具的实用性。