Bui Viet Long, Hughes Angus E, Ragonnet Romain, Meehan Michael T, Henderson Alec, McBryde Emma S, Trauer James M
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 6;24(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10245-y.
Traditional epidemiological models tend to oversimplify the transmission dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) to replicate observed tuberculosis (TB) epidemic patterns. This has led to growing interest in advanced methodologies like agent-based modelling (ABM), which can more accurately represent the complex heterogeneity of TB transmission.
To better understand the use of agent-based models (ABMs) in this context, we conducted a systematic review with two main objectives: (1) to examine how ABMs have been employed to model the intricate heterogeneity of M.tb transmission, and (2) to identify the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing ABMs for M.tb.
We conducted a systematic search following PRISMA guidelines across four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, and Scopus), limiting our review to peer-reviewed articles published in English up to December 2022. Data were extracted by two investigators using a standardized extraction tool. Prospero registration: CRD42022380580.
Our review included peer-reviewed articles in English that implement agent-based, individual-based, or microsimulation models of M.tb transmission. Models focusing solely on in-vitro or within-host dynamics were excluded. Data extraction targeted the methodological, epidemiological, and computational characteristics of ABMs used for TB transmission. A risk of bias assessment was not conducted as the review synthesized modelling studies without pooling epidemiological data.
Our search initially identified 5,077 studies, from which we ultimately included 26 in our final review after exclusions. These studies varied in population settings, time horizons, and model complexity. While many incorporated population heterogeneity and household structures, some lacked essential features like spatial structures or economic evaluations. Only eight studies provided publicly accessible code, highlighting the need for improved transparency.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: ABMs are a versatile approach for representing complex disease dynamics, particularly in cases like TB, where they address heterogeneous mixing and household transmission often overlooked by traditional models. However, their advanced capabilities come with challenges, including those arising from their stochastic nature, such as parameter tuning and high computational expense. To improve transparency and reproducibility, open-source code sharing, and standardised reporting are recommended to enhance ABM reliability in studying epidemiologically complex diseases like TB.
传统流行病学模型往往过度简化结核分枝杆菌(M.tb)的传播动态,以复制观察到的结核病(TB)流行模式。这使得人们对基于主体的建模(ABM)等先进方法越来越感兴趣,因为这种方法能够更准确地呈现结核病传播的复杂异质性。
为了更好地理解在这种情况下基于主体模型(ABM)的应用,我们进行了一项系统综述,有两个主要目的:(1)研究ABM如何被用于模拟M.tb传播的复杂异质性,以及(2)确定实施M.tb的ABM所面临的挑战和机遇。
我们按照PRISMA指南在四个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、全球健康和Scopus)中进行了系统检索,将综述限制在截至2022年12月以英文发表的同行评审文章。数据由两名研究人员使用标准化提取工具提取。Prospero注册编号:CRD42022380580。
我们的综述纳入了以英文发表的、实施基于主体、基于个体或微观模拟的M.tb传播模型的同行评审文章。仅关注体外或宿主内动态的模型被排除。数据提取针对用于结核病传播的ABM的方法学、流行病学和计算特征。由于该综述综合了建模研究而未汇总流行病学数据,因此未进行偏倚风险评估。
我们的检索最初识别出5077项研究,经过排除后,最终在我们的最终综述中纳入了26项。这些研究在人群背景、时间范围和模型复杂性方面各不相同。虽然许多研究纳入了人群异质性和家庭结构,但有些研究缺乏空间结构或经济评估等基本特征。只有八项研究提供了可公开获取的代码,这凸显了提高透明度的必要性。
ABM是一种用于呈现复杂疾病动态的通用方法,特别是在结核病这类案例中,它能够解决传统模型常常忽略的异质混合和家庭传播问题。然而,其先进的能力也伴随着挑战,包括因随机性质产生的挑战,如参数调整和高计算成本。为了提高透明度和可重复性,建议进行开源代码共享和标准化报告,以增强ABM在研究结核病等流行病学复杂疾病中的可靠性。