Fader Mandy, Macaulay Margaret, Wilson Nina, Goudie Nicola, Chadwick Thomas J, Abouhajar Alaa, Jones Jeremy, Watson Gillian, Avery Miriam R, Broadbridge Jackie, Buckley Brian S, Clancy Bridget, Cottenden Alan, Dickson Sylvia, Guerrero Karen, Hagen Suzanne, James Catherine P, Khasriya Rajvinder, Little Paul, May Carl R, McClurg Doreen, Moore Michael, Murphy Cathy, Prieto Jacqui, Reading Isabel, Shields Carol, Timoney Anthony, Wilks Sandra A
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 31;14(8):e088483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088483.
Evaluating the safety and acceptability of reusing catheters for intermittent catheterisation (IC) is one of the top 10 continence research priorities identified by the UK James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in 2008. There are an estimated 50 000 IC users in England and this number is rising. Globally, both single-use catheters (thrown away after use) and multi-use/reusable ones (cleaned between uses) are used. Using multi-use catheters as well as single-use ones (mixed-use) could bring benefits (eg, reducing plastic waste and patients never running out of catheters) and offer more choice to users. Evidence is needed that mixed-use is at least as safe and acceptable as using only single-use catheters.
The MultICath Trial is a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial involving 578 participants. The aim is to compare mixed-use catheter management with single-use catheter management over 12 months. Participants are randomised on a 1:1 basis to either mixed-use catheter management, which includes an evidence-based cleaning method for the multi-use catheters (intervention) or single-use catheter management (control). Following randomisation, participants are followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome is at least one episode of microbiologically confirmed symptomatic urinary tract infection with help-seeking or self-help behaviour over the 12-month follow-up period. Laboratory analysis of patient-initiated urine samples is blind. Secondary outcomes include antibiotic use, microhaematuria, visible blood on catheter/in urine, quality of life and health economics. A qualitative sub-study to examine participant experiences using mixed-use is included.
Ethical review was undertaken by South Central-Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee and favourable opinion was granted on 12 July 2019 (reference: 19/SC/0334). Written, informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, in the National Institute for Health and Care Research journal library and to participants and the public via a lay summary published on the trial website.
ISRCTN42028483.
评估间歇性导尿(IC)中重复使用导尿管的安全性和可接受性是英国詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作伙伴组织在2008年确定的十大尿失禁研究重点之一。据估计,英格兰有50000名间歇性导尿使用者,且这一数字正在上升。在全球范围内,一次性导尿管(使用后丢弃)和多次使用/可重复使用导尿管(使用之间进行清洁)都在使用。同时使用多次使用导尿管和一次性导尿管(混合使用)可能会带来好处(例如,减少塑料垃圾,患者永远不会用完导尿管),并为使用者提供更多选择。需要有证据表明混合使用至少与仅使用一次性导尿管一样安全且可接受。
MultICath试验是一项非劣效性随机对照试验,涉及578名参与者。目的是比较12个月内混合使用导尿管管理与一次性导尿管管理。参与者按1:1随机分为混合使用导尿管管理组,其中包括对多次使用导尿管采用循证清洁方法(干预)或一次性导尿管管理组(对照)。随机分组后,对参与者进行12个月的随访。主要结局是在12个月随访期内至少有一次经微生物学确诊的有症状尿路感染且伴有寻求帮助或自助行为。对患者自行采集的尿液样本进行实验室分析是盲法操作。次要结局包括抗生素使用、微量血尿、导尿管上/尿液中可见血液、生活质量和卫生经济学。纳入了一项定性子研究,以考察参与者使用混合使用导尿管的体验。
由中南汉普郡A研究伦理委员会进行伦理审查,并于2019年7月12日给予了肯定意见(参考号:19/SC/0334)。获得了所有参与者的书面知情同意书以参与研究。结果将在同行评审出版物、国家卫生与保健研究所期刊库中发表,并通过试验网站上发布的通俗总结向参与者和公众公布。
ISRCTN42028483。