Čavojská Natália, Ivančík Vladimír, Straková Alexandra, Januška Jakub, Dančík Daniel, Vašečková Barbora, Forgáčová Ľubica, Krajčovičová Dana, Kraus Jakub, Pečeňák Ján, Heretik Anton, Hajdúk Michal
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
The Centre for Psychiatric Disorders Research, Science Park, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia.
Psych J. 2025 Apr;14(2):258-266. doi: 10.1002/pchj.816. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
The present study examines the impact of induced social stress on facial trustworthiness judgments in individuals with schizophrenia (SCZ) and the associations between symptoms and trustworthiness ratings. Thirty-three individuals with SCZ and forty healthy controls (HC) were asked to rate the trustworthiness of 24 digitally morphed faces in two counterbalanced conditions. Mild social stress was induced by listening to loud noises from a busy street. BPRS, CAPE-42, and the Paranoia Scale measured the severity of symptoms. We did not observe significant differences in trustworthiness judgments between the patient and control groups. Social stress did not impact trust judgments. Paranoia was negatively connected to trustworthiness ratings in the control group. Subjective rating of stress in noise condition was negatively associated with paranoia only in the control sample. In the patient group, a negative correlation was found between trustworthiness ratings in stress conditions and the severity of self-reported negative symptoms. Our results suggest that mild social stress does not significantly affect trustworthiness judgments in either patients with SCZ or in HC. Differences between the patient and control groups in trustworthiness judgments were negligible. Overall, the results of this study can be considered mainly negative and contrast with previous studies. The stress induction paradigm or a smaller sample size might cause observed results. In controls, biased face perception was linked to trait paranoia. By contrast, in SCZ, other factors might impact trust perception and need further examination.
本研究考察了诱导性社会压力对精神分裂症患者(SCZ)面部可信度判断的影响以及症状与可信度评分之间的关联。33名SCZ患者和40名健康对照者(HC)被要求在两种平衡条件下对24张数字变形脸的可信度进行评分。通过听繁忙街道的嘈杂声来诱导轻度社会压力。采用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、42项阳性和阴性症状量表(CAPE-42)以及偏执量表来测量症状的严重程度。我们没有观察到患者组和对照组在可信度判断上有显著差异。社会压力并未影响信任判断。在对照组中,偏执与可信度评分呈负相关。仅在对照组样本中,噪声条件下的主观压力评分与偏执呈负相关。在患者组中,压力条件下的可信度评分与自我报告的阴性症状严重程度之间存在负相关。我们的结果表明,轻度社会压力对SCZ患者或HC的可信度判断均无显著影响。患者组和对照组在可信度判断上的差异可忽略不计。总体而言,本研究结果主要可视为阴性,与先前的研究形成对比。压力诱导范式或样本量较小可能导致观察到的结果。在对照组中,有偏差的面部感知与特质偏执有关。相比之下,在SCZ患者中,其他因素可能会影响信任感知,需要进一步研究。