Chen Trevor C, Tseng Wei-Chin, Kang Hsing-Yu, Chan Chuan-Wei, Chen Hsin-Lian, Nosaka Kazunori
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, TAIWAN.
Department of Physical Education, University of Taipei, Taipei City, TAIWAN.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 May 1;57(5):970-983. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003622. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
We tested the hypothesis that muscle damage protection effect would be induced by its antagonist muscle eccentric exercise.
Sedentary young (20-28 yr) men were randomly assigned into six groups; three groups each for arm or leg exercise group ( n = 12/group). One group performed two bouts of 30 maximal eccentric contractions (30MaxEC) of the elbow flexors (EF) or 60 maximal eccentric contractions (60MaxEC) of the knee flexors (KF) using a different arm (contra-EF-EF) or leg (contra-KF-KF) between bouts. The other two groups performed 30MaxEC of the elbow extensors (EE) or 60MaxEC of the knee extensors (KE) first followed by the 30MaxEC of EF or 60MaxEC of KF using the ipsilateral (ipsi-EE-EF, ipsi-KE-KF) or contralateral limb (contra-EE-EF, contra-KE-KF). The two exercise bouts were separated by 2 wk for all groups. Changes in muscle damage markers before to 5 d after exercise were compared among the groups by mixed-design two-way ANOVA.
Changes in the markers after the second bout of the ipsi-EE-EF, contra-EE-EF, ipsi-KE-KF, and contra-KE-KF groups were smaller ( P < 0.05) than those after the first bout of the contra-EF-EF and contra-KF-KF groups, respectively. The changes after the second bout were smaller ( P < 0.05) for the ipsi-EE-EF than contra-EE-EF, and ipsi-KE-KF than contra-KE-KF group; however, those in the contra-EE-EF and contra-KE-KF groups were larger ( P < 0.05) than those after the second bout of the contra-EF-EF and contra-KF-KF groups.
These results showed that the magnitude of muscle damage of EF or KF was reduced by the initial bout of EE or KE eccentric exercise performed by both ipsilateral and contralateral limbs, suggesting that muscle damage protective effect is conferred by the antagonist muscle in the same and opposite limbs.
我们检验了其拮抗肌离心运动可诱导肌肉损伤保护效应这一假设。
久坐不动的年轻男性(20 - 28岁)被随机分为六组;每组12人,分别为手臂或腿部运动组。一组进行两组肘部屈肌(EF)的30次最大离心收缩(30MaxEC)或膝部屈肌(KF)的60次最大离心收缩(60MaxEC),两组运动之间使用不同的手臂(对侧-EF-EF)或腿部(对侧-KF-KF)。另外两组先进行肘部伸肌(EE)的30MaxEC或膝部伸肌(KE)的60MaxEC,然后使用同侧(同侧-EE-EF、同侧-KE-KF)或对侧肢体(对侧-EE-EF、对侧-KE-KF)进行EF的30MaxEC或KF的60MaxEC。所有组的两次运动之间间隔2周。通过混合设计双向方差分析比较各组运动前至运动后5天肌肉损伤标志物的变化。
同侧-EE-EF、对侧-EE-EF、同侧-KE-KF和对侧-KE-KF组第二次运动后标志物的变化分别小于对侧-EF-EF和对侧-KF-KF组第一次运动后的变化(P < 0.05)。同侧-EE-EF组第二次运动后的变化小于对侧-EE-EF组,同侧-KE-KF组小于对侧-KE-KF组(P < 0.05);然而,对侧-EE-EF和对侧-KE-KF组的变化大于对侧-EF-EF和对侧-KF-KF组第二次运动后的变化(P < 0.05)。
这些结果表明,同侧和对侧肢体进行的EE或KE初始离心运动可降低EF或KF的肌肉损伤程度,提示同一肢体和对侧肢体的拮抗肌均具有肌肉损伤保护效应。