Suppr超能文献

支持教师基于数据的早期写作教学个性化:一项效能试验。

Supporting Teachers' Data-Based Individualization of Early Writing Instruction: An Efficacy Trial.

作者信息

McMaster Kristen L, Lembke Erica S, Shanahan Emma, Choi Seohyeon, An Jechun, Schatschneider Christopher, Duesenberg-Marshall McKinzie D, Birinci Seyma, McCollom Elizabeth, Garman Carol, Moore Kim

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2025 Jul-Aug;58(4):287-303. doi: 10.1177/00222194241300324. Epub 2024 Dec 8.

Abstract

In a multiyear, multisite, randomized control trial, we examined the effects of comprehensive professional development designed to support teachers' data-based instruction (DBI) for students with intensive early writing needs. Teachers ( = 154; primarily special educators or intervention specialists) were assigned randomly to a treatment group ( = 76), in which they received tools, learning, and coaching to support their DBI implementation over 20 weeks, or to a control group ( = 78). Students either received DBI in early writing ( = 155) from treatment teachers or their usual writing instruction ( = 154) from control teachers. Treatment teachers outperformed controls on measures of DBI knowledge and skills ( = 1.57) and self-efficacy for writing instruction ( = .94), and treatment students outperformed controls on proximal and distal writing outcomes (s = .14-.29). Student characteristics (grade, special education status, English learner status, and race/ethnicity) did not moderate intervention effects. We discuss findings in terms of the importance of supporting students with intensive learning needs, the efficacy and feasibility of implementing DBI-TLC, and implications for pre- and in-service teacher training and support.

摘要

在一项多年、多地点的随机对照试验中,我们研究了旨在支持教师为有强烈早期写作需求的学生开展基于数据的教学(DBI)的全面专业发展的效果。教师(n = 154;主要是特殊教育教师或干预专家)被随机分配到一个治疗组(n = 76),在该组中,他们在20周内接受工具、学习和指导,以支持他们实施DBI,或者被分配到一个对照组(n = 78)。学生要么接受治疗组教师的早期写作DBI(n = 155),要么接受对照组教师的常规写作教学(n = 154)。治疗组教师在DBI知识和技能(d = 1.57)以及写作教学自我效能感(d = 0.94)的测量上表现优于对照组,治疗组学生在近端和远端写作成果上表现优于对照组(ds = 0.14 - 0.29)。学生特征(年级、特殊教育状况、英语学习者状况以及种族/族裔)并未调节干预效果。我们从支持有强烈学习需求的学生的重要性、实施DBI - TLC的有效性和可行性以及对职前和在职教师培训与支持的影响等方面讨论了研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验