Suppr超能文献

转移性胰腺导管腺癌的真实世界临床结局与经济负担:一项系统综述

Real-world clinical outcomes and economic burden of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.

作者信息

Cockrum Paul, Dennen Syvart, Brown Audrey, Briggs Jonathon, Paluri Ravi

机构信息

Medical Affairs, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Genesis Research Group, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2025 Jan;21(2):241-260. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2435253. Epub 2024 Dec 8.

Abstract

AIMS

This systematic review summarizes real-world clinical outcomes and economic burden of first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX)/modified FFX (mFFX) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GnP) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the US.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE were searched for materials published since 2014; citations were reviewed in a two-step process. Included studies were qualitatively synthesized.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 2,528 citations; 29 were included (17 clinical studies/12 economic studies). In 9/17 clinical studies, median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 4.7 months to 11.4 months for FFX/mFFX, with the unweighted median of the estimates within this range being 9.2 months; for GnP mOS ranged from 3.6 to 9.8 months, and the unweighted median of the estimates was 6.9 months. In 8/17 studies, grade 3/4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were the most commonly reported adverse events. Across economic burden studies, total costs were similar between the 2 groups. Outpatient, supportive care, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor costs were higher for the FFX generic regimen, and chemotherapy costs were higher for the GnP branded regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world OS in FFX- and GnP-treated populations was shorter than that in clinical trials, and total costs of FFX and GnP were similar, but with differences in cost components.

摘要

目的

本系统评价总结了美国一线应用FOLFIRINOX(FFX)/改良FOLFIRINOX(mFFX)和白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(GnP)治疗转移性胰腺导管腺癌的真实世界临床结局和经济负担。

方法

检索Embase和MEDLINE中自2014年以来发表的资料;通过两步流程对文献进行综述。对纳入的研究进行定性综合分析。

结果

检索得到2528篇文献;纳入29篇(17项临床研究/12项经济研究)。在17项临床研究中的9项中,FFX/mFFX组的中位总生存期(mOS)为4.7个月至11.4个月,该范围内估计值的未加权中位数为9.2个月;GnP组的mOS为3.6至9.8个月,估计值的未加权中位数为6.9个月。在17项研究中的8项中,3/4级贫血、中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少是最常报告的不良事件。在各项经济负担研究中,两组的总成本相似。FFX通用方案的门诊、支持治疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子成本较高,GnP品牌方案的化疗成本较高。

结论

FFX和GnP治疗人群的真实世界总生存期短于临床试验,FFX和GnP的总成本相似,但成本构成有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4b6/11792790/b06a06e81f48/IFON_A_2435253_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验