• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前血压对经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术后结局的影响:是悖论还是其他原因?

The Impact of Preprocedural Blood Pressure on Outcome After M-TEER: The Paradox or Something Else?

作者信息

Tadic Marijana, Schneider Leonhard, Nita Nicoleta, Felbel Dominik, Paukovitsch Michael, Gröger Mathias, Keßler Mirjam, Rottbauer Wolfang

机构信息

Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70062. doi: 10.1002/clc.70062.

DOI:10.1002/clc.70062
PMID:39648949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626250/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) values on admission on the outcome of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).

METHODOLOGY

We included all patients who underwent interventional MV repair in our institution between January 2010 and October 2020. All data are obtained from the MiTra ULM registry. Based on SBP values measured on admission, all patients were divided into four groups: < 120, 120-129, 130-139, and ≥ 140 mmHg.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in this study. There were no major differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the four observed groups. The patients with SBP on admission ≥ 140 mmHg had the lowest prevalence of functional MR and the highest LVEF. Higher SBP at admission (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87) and preprocedural LVEF values (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99) were predictors of lower 1-year mortality but did not impact 1-year hospitalization rate or MACE in the whole study population. When patients were separated into two groups according to the mechanisms of MR (functional and structural), the results showed that higher SBP on admission and better preprocedural LVEF were associated with significantly lower 1-year CV mortality in both groups of patients, with functional and structural MR. Higher SBP at admission was also associated with lower 1-year CV mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.96) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), but not with 1-year rehospitalization and MACE.

CONCLUSION

Higher SBP on admission (> 140 mmHg) is an independent predictor of a better 1-year outcome in patients treated with M-TEER. The effect of higher SBP on outcome after M-TEER should be further investigated.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨入院时收缩压(SBP)值对经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术(M-TEER)结果的影响。

方法

我们纳入了2010年1月至2020年10月在我院接受介入性二尖瓣修复的所有患者。所有数据均来自MiTra ULM登记处。根据入院时测得的SBP值,将所有患者分为四组:<120、120-129、130-139和≥140 mmHg。

结果

本研究共纳入858例患者。四个观察组在人口统计学和临床特征方面无重大差异。入院时SBP≥140 mmHg的患者功能性二尖瓣反流患病率最低,左心室射血分数(LVEF)最高。入院时较高SBP(风险比[HR]0.74,95%置信区间[CI]:0.63-0.87)和术前LVEF值(HR 0.99,95%CI:0.97-0.99)是1年死亡率较低的预测因素,但对整个研究人群的1年住院率或主要不良心血管事件(MACE)无影响。当根据二尖瓣反流机制(功能性和结构性)将患者分为两组时,结果显示,入院时较高SBP和较好术前LVEF与功能性和结构性二尖瓣反流两组患者的1年心血管死亡率显著降低相关。入院时较高SBP也与射血分数保留(LVEF>50%)患者的1年心血管死亡率较低(HR 0.73,95%CI:0.55-0.96)相关,但与1年再住院率和MACE无关。

结论

入院时较高SBP(>140 mmHg)是接受M-TEER治疗患者1年预后较好的独立预测因素。较高SBP对M-TEER术后结果的影响应进一步研究。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Preprocedural Blood Pressure on Outcome After M-TEER: The Paradox or Something Else?术前血压对经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术后结局的影响:是悖论还是其他原因?
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70062. doi: 10.1002/clc.70062.
2
Paradox of disproportionate atrial functional mitral regurgitation and survival after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.经导管缘对缘修复术后功能性二尖瓣反流伴左心房功能障碍与生存悖论。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2447-2450. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14789. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
3
Impact of residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in atrial functional mitral regurgitation: Results from MITRA-PRO registry.经导管缘对缘修复术治疗左心房功能性二尖瓣反流后残余二尖瓣反流的影响:MITRA-PRO 注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov;104(5):1015-1026. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31242. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Predictors and clinical impact of worsening left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.二尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复术后左心室射血分数恶化的预测因素及其临床影响。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 18;20(22):1430-1441. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01092.
5
Long-Term Outcomes After Edge-to-Edge Repair of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: 5-Year Results From the EuroSMR Registry.缘对缘修复二尖瓣反流的长期结果:EuroSMR 注册研究的 5 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov 11;17(21):2543-2554. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.016.
6
Increased Afterload in Patients With Acute Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.二尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复术后左心室射血分数急性降低患者的后负荷增加
Echocardiography. 2025 Feb;42(2):e70095. doi: 10.1111/echo.70095.
7
Hyperacute Effects of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair on Left Ventricular Volumes and Functions.二尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复术对左心室容积和功能的超急性影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Apr 15;241:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.038. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
8
Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation With Preserved Left Ventricular Function.经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术治疗左心室功能保留的继发性二尖瓣反流。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov 11;17(21):2515-2526. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.031.
9
Impact of beta-blocker uptitration on patients after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: The OCEAN-mitral registry.经导管缘对缘二尖瓣修复术后β受体阻滞剂滴定对继发性二尖瓣反流患者的影响:OCEAN-二尖瓣注册研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;418:132595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132595. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
10
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Multiple Valvular Heart Disease: Outcomes and Insights on Combined Aortic Insufficiency and Mitral Regurgitation.经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗多种瓣膜性心脏病:主动脉瓣关闭不全合并二尖瓣反流的结果和见解。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Dec 15;233:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.032. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute Reduction in Left Ventricular Function Following Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair.经导管二尖瓣瓣环成形术后左心室功能急性下降。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e029735. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029735. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair-A Decade Experience in 1000+ Patients.接受二尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复术患者的糖尿病——1000 多名患者的十年经验
J Clin Med. 2023 May 16;12(10):3502. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103502.
3
Three-year outcomes for transcatheter repair in patients with mitral regurgitation from the CLASP study.
CLASP 研究中经导管二尖瓣反流患者的 3 年治疗结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul;102(1):145-154. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30686. Epub 2023 May 13.
4
Five-Year Follow-up after Transcatheter Repair of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.经导管修复二尖瓣反流后的 5 年随访。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 1;388(22):2037-2048. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300213. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
5
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
6
Implications of concomitant obstructive or restrictive pulmonary diseases on functional and clinical results after MitraClip.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):E1000-E1006. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29893. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
7
Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair.经皮二尖瓣瓣环成形术后中期临床结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Dec;32(12):E313-E320. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00121. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
Impact of Proportionality of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation on Outcome After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.继发性二尖瓣反流程度对经导管二尖瓣修复术后结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr;14(4):715-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Impact of obesity on adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve edge-to-edge repair using MitraClip® procedure - Results from the German nationwide inpatient sample.肥胖对使用 MitraClip® 手术行经皮二尖瓣瓣环成形术患者住院不良结局的影响-来自德国全国住院患者样本的结果。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jul 24;30(8):1365-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Five-year outcomes of transcatheter reduction of significant mitral regurgitation in high-surgical-risk patients.高手术风险患者经导管二尖瓣大量反流减少的 5 年结果。
Heart. 2019 Nov;105(21):1622-1628. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312605. Epub 2018 Aug 4.