Suppr超能文献

基于文献和观察确定临床前医学教育PBL小组中代表能动参与的行为

Identifying Behaviours Representative of Agentic Engagement in Pre-clinical Medical Education PBL Groups Based on Literature and Observations.

作者信息

Androni Alexandra, Fleer Joke, Smids Laura R, van der Wouden Joke M, Jaarsma A Debbie C, Schönrock-Adema Johanna

机构信息

University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Wenckebach Institute for Education and Training, Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), Groningen, The Netherlands.

University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;13(1):608-619. doi: 10.5334/pme.1414. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this study we aimed to identify behaviours representative of agentic engagement in pre-clinical medical education problem-based learning (PBL) groups. Agentic engagement is defined as the proactive, intentional contributions students make to their flow of instruction. This concept, developed in secondary education, appears relevant for benefitting optimally from PBL in higher medical education.

METHODS

We followed a four-step process to identify any behaviours representative of agentic engagement in our PBL setting. Following a literature search on agentic engagement scales, proactive behaviour, PBL practices and adult learning, we listed behaviours that could denote agentic engagement in our context. We fine-tuned this list through exploratory observations and tailored it to our specific context of second-year PBL groups.

RESULTS

We identified ten observable student behaviours representative of agentic engagement within medical PBL groups. Some aligned with previous literature (asking questions, telling the teacher what they (dis)like, telling the teacher what they are interested in, defending opinions, expressing expectations, suggesting co-operation), and others had not been identified before as representative of agentic engagement (making learning as interactive as possible, creating alternative ways of covering the material, correcting content and enriching others' insights); thereby introducing novel behaviours unique to our setting.

DISCUSSION

In medical PBL groups, we identified both known agentic engagement behaviours and distinctive behaviours specific to our context, thereby highlighting that the expression of agentic engagement is context-bound.

摘要

引言

在本研究中,我们旨在确定临床前医学教育基于问题的学习(PBL)小组中具有能动参与代表性的行为。能动参与被定义为学生对其学习流程做出的主动、有意的贡献。这一在中等教育中发展起来的概念,似乎与在高等医学教育中从PBL中获得最佳收益相关。

方法

我们遵循了一个四步流程来确定在我们的PBL环境中具有能动参与代表性的任何行为。在对能动参与量表、主动行为、PBL实践和成人学习进行文献检索后,我们列出了在我们的背景下可能表示能动参与的行为。我们通过探索性观察对这份清单进行了微调,并使其适用于我们二年级PBL小组的特定背景。

结果

我们确定了医学PBL小组中具有能动参与代表性的十种可观察到的学生行为。其中一些与先前的文献一致(提问、告诉老师他们喜欢或不喜欢什么、告诉老师他们感兴趣的事情、捍卫观点、表达期望、建议合作),而其他行为以前未被确定为能动参与的代表(使学习尽可能具有互动性、创造涵盖材料的替代方法、纠正内容并丰富他人的见解);从而引入了我们环境中独有的新行为。

讨论

在医学PBL小组中,我们既确定了已知的能动参与行为,也确定了特定于我们背景的独特行为,从而突出表明能动参与的表现是受背景限制的。

相似文献

3
Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 4;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0550-3.
4
Influence of tutor interventions and group process on medical students' engagement in problem-based learning.
Med Educ. 2024 Nov;58(11):1315-1323. doi: 10.1111/medu.15387. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
From PBL tutoring to PBL coaching in undergraduate medical education: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
Med Educ Online. 2016 Jul 8;21:31973. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31973. eCollection 2016.
6
Emotional responses of tutors and students in problem-based learning: lessons for staff development.
Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):145-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02064.x.
7
Perceptions of radiography students toward problem-based learning almost two decades after its introduction at Makerere University, Uganda.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Dec;51(4):639-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
Knowledge Construction in Problem-Based Learning: A Lag-Sequential Analysis of Teachers' and Students' Discourse Moves.
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Aug-Sep;36(4):411-424. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2230559. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
I don't think that means what you think it means: Why precision in lifelong learning terminology matters to medical education.
Med Teach. 2022 Jul;44(7):702-706. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2055456. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Connecting teachers' classroom instructions with children's metacognition and learning in elementary school.
Metacogn Learn. 2021;16(3):623-650. doi: 10.1007/s11409-020-09248-2. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
4
Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138.
Med Teach. 2021 Aug;43(8):924-936. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
5
Collaborative learning: Elements encouraging and hindering deep approach to learning and use of elaboration strategies.
Med Teach. 2020 Nov;42(11):1261-1269. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1801996. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
How medical students' perceptions of instructor autonomy-support mediate their motivation and psychological well-being.
Med Teach. 2020 Jun;42(6):650-656. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1726308. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Peer-assisted learning (PAL): skills lab tutors' experiences and motivation.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1760-2.
8
Teachers' Conditional Regard and Students' Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Apr;49(4):790-803. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
The self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment - a scoping review.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0956-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验