Suppr超能文献

机器灌注时代澳大利亚心脏移植的结果。

Australian outcomes from heart transplantation in the machine perfusion era.

作者信息

Joshi Yashutosh, MacLean Campbell, Emmanuel Sam, Wang Katherine, Soto Claudio, Villanueva Jeanette, Gao Ling, Doyle Aoife, Dutta Sanjay, Wu Jianxin, Vaidhya Nikunj, Granger Emily, Watson Alasdair, Connellan Mark, Iyer Arjun, Jansz Paul, Macdonald Peter

机构信息

Heart Transplant Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(6):502-512. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-dcd-0074. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the current era of heart transplantation, machine perfusion strategies are emerging as potential additions to the armamentarium of a transplant unit. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor hearts assessed through normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has helped expand the donor pool. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) is emerging as an alternative strategy to traditional static cold storage (SCS) when a prolonged ischemic time is anticipated in brain dead (BD) donors, this is important in Australia where long distant procurement is vital. In this study we examine the outcomes in our unit where both forms of machine perfusion (NMP and HMP), as well as SCS is utilized for donor heart preservation, with a particular focus on severe primary graft dysfunction (sPGD) and mortality.

METHODS

The year 2021 represents the year when both forms of machine perfusion were available to our unit. Heart transplants in our unit from January 2021 to February 2024 were categorized into three groups for retrospective analysis: (I) DCD-NMP group (n=44); (II) BD-HMP group (n=38), and (III) BD-SCS group (n=78).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean donor and recipient ages between the three groups. Donor preservation time in the BD-HMP group was significantly longer than the donor ischemic time in the BD-SCS group, and organ care system (OCS) run time in the DCD-NMP group (361±89 208±47 and 249±49 min respectively, P<0.001). For DCD-NMP, BD-HMP and BD-SCS groups respectively: 30-day survival was: 100%, 97% and 100%; 1-year survival was: 94%, 90% and 94%; 2-year survival was: 90%, 90% and 89% (P=0.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of sPGD between the three groups (DCD-NMP: 7%, BD-HMP: 5%, and BD-SCS: 5%, P=0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine perfusion strategies represent important additions to the modern transplant unit and can expand the donor pool. Results are encouraging with no differences in 2-year survival or incidence of sPGD across the preservation modalities: DCD-NMP, BD-HMP, and BD-SCS.

摘要

背景

在当前心脏移植时代,机器灌注策略正逐渐成为移植单位可用手段的潜在补充。通过常温机器灌注(NMP)评估的循环死亡后捐赠(DCD)供体心脏有助于扩大供体库。当预计脑死亡(BD)供体的缺血时间延长时,低温机器灌注(HMP)正成为传统静态冷藏(SCS)的替代策略,这在澳大利亚很重要,因为远距离获取供体至关重要。在本研究中,我们考察了我们单位使用两种形式的机器灌注(NMP和HMP)以及SCS保存供体心脏的结果,特别关注严重原发性移植物功能障碍(sPGD)和死亡率。

方法

2021年是我们单位可使用两种形式机器灌注的年份。将我们单位2021年1月至2024年2月的心脏移植分为三组进行回顾性分析:(I)DCD-NMP组(n = 44);(II)BD-HMP组(n = 38),以及(III)BD-SCS组(n = 78)。

结果

三组之间供体和受体的平均年龄无显著差异。BD-HMP组的供体保存时间显著长于BD-SCS组的供体缺血时间以及DCD-NMP组的器官护理系统(OCS)运行时间(分别为361±89、208±47和249±49分钟,P<0.001)。对于DCD-NMP组、BD-HMP组和BD-SCS组,30天生存率分别为:100%、97%和100%;1年生存率分别为:94%、90%和94%;2年生存率分别为:90%、90%和89%(P = 0.9)。三组之间sPGD的发生率无显著差异(DCD-NMP组:7%,BD-HMP组:5%,BD-SCS组:5%,P = 0.9)。

结论

机器灌注策略是现代移植单位的重要补充,可扩大供体库。令人鼓舞的是,在DCD-NMP、BD-HMP和BD-SCS这几种保存方式中,2年生存率或sPGD发生率没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f89b/11618123/c09357f2d6c9/acs-13-06-502-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验