Suppr超能文献

依拉环素与替加环素治疗重症监护病房复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、单盲、平行随机对照试验研究方案

Efficacy and safety of eravacycline versus tigecycline for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the ICU: a multicenter, single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial study protocol.

作者信息

Liu Jin Jie, Guo Dong Dong, Wang Meng Xing, Li Yan Zhao, Li Hang, Liu Si Bo, Yang Rong Li, Zhang Dian Hong

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Dalian Municipal Central Hospital), Dalian, China.

Intensive Care Unit, Ansteel Group General Hospital, Anshan, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 22;11:1496402. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1496402. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), often caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant (CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a critical challenge in ICUs. Owing to their high mortality and treatment failure rates, there is an urgent need for effective therapies. This trial will compare eravacycline to tigecycline for treating cIAIs in patients in the ICU, aiming to provide a superior treatment option.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, single-blind, parallel randomized controlled trial. Adult patients in the ICU with complex abdominal infections who meet the eligibility criteria will be included. The main outcome is the all-cause 30-day mortality of patients in clinically evaluable and microbiologically evaluable populations. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of total responsive patients in the clinically evaluable population at the end of treatment and test of cure visits; the proportion of total responsive patients in the microbiologically evaluable population at the end of treatment and test of cure visits; and ICU hospitalization time and costs. Safety assessments include the incidence of various adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory test results. The subjects will be randomly assigned to receive treatment with either eravacycline or tigecycline at a 1:1 ratio. The all-cause mortality rates of patients treated with eravacycline and TGC were 17.7 and 18.7%, respectively, with an estimated actual mortality rate of 0.95. A total sample size of 262 subjects is required to reach 80% power with an of 0.05. Considering a 10% loss rate, 292 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to the three groups in equal proportions.

ETHICS AND COMMUNICATION

This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ansteel Group General Hospital. The communication plan includes presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications, and presentations to the public through nonprofessional media.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, ChiCTR2300078646.

摘要

背景

复杂腹腔内感染(cIAIs)通常由耐碳青霉烯类细菌(CRAB)和耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)等多重耐药菌引起,是重症监护病房面临的一项严峻挑战。由于其高死亡率和治疗失败率,迫切需要有效的治疗方法。本试验将比较依拉环素与替加环素治疗重症监护病房患者cIAIs的效果,旨在提供一种更优的治疗选择。

方法

这是一项多中心、单盲、平行随机对照试验。将纳入符合入选标准的重症监护病房成年复杂腹腔感染患者。主要结局是临床可评估和微生物学可评估人群中患者的全因30天死亡率。次要结局包括治疗结束时和治愈检查访视时临床可评估人群中完全缓解患者的比例;治疗结束时和治愈检查访视时微生物学可评估人群中完全缓解患者的比例;以及重症监护病房住院时间和费用。安全性评估包括各种不良事件的发生率和临床实验室检查结果的变化。受试者将按1:1的比例随机分配接受依拉环素或替加环素治疗。接受依拉环素和替加环素治疗的患者全因死亡率分别为17.7%和18.7%,估计实际死亡率为0.95。需要262名受试者的总样本量才能在α为0.05时达到80%的检验效能。考虑到10%的失访率,将招募292名患者并等比例随机分配到三组。

伦理与沟通

本试验已获得鞍钢集团总医院伦理委员会的批准。沟通计划包括在科学会议上发表演讲、科学出版物以及通过非专业媒体向公众进行演讲。

临床试验注册

https://clinicaltrials.gov/,ChiCTR2300078646。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f295/11620859/cd0382b1b178/fmed-11-1496402-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验