Núñez-Peña Emilia, Kelly Ryan P, Campos Santiago, Diaz Maria C, Castillo Pamela A, Kataria Shivangi, Perez Alexia M, Beletanga Maria Dolores, Torres Alcy R
Tecnológico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2024 Oct 19;14:200131. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2024.200131. eCollection 2024 Dec.
The objective of this retrospective study is to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up for postconcussion clearance in pediatric patients by comparing loss to follow-up and full clearance patients.
This retrospective single-center cohort study analyzed 140 consecutive patients at a pediatric concussion clinic of a safety-net hospital for loss to follow-up, defined as not achieving clearance at last appointment. Univariate and multivariate regression models were fit on variables of interest, including demographic, mechanism and severity of concussion, and characteristics of the first evaluation postconcussion and follow-up management.
Of the sample, 40% (n = 56) achieved clearance and 60% (n = 84) were lost to follow-up. Median age was 15 (IQR 11-17), with male predominance (60.7%). Living with a biological parent (OR = 0.145, 95% CI = 0.028-0.760) and sports involvement (OR = 0.256, 95% CI = 0.092-0.764) were protective factors, while being 10 years old or older (OR = 13.466, 95% CI = 2.792-64.958) and attending 2 or fewer follow-up appointments (OR = 19.027, 95% CI = 4.991-72.533) were risk factors for loss to follow-up. No significant differences were found between sex, race, driving distance, type of insurance, and mechanism of injury.
Living with a biological parent and involvement in sports showed to be protective factors for loss to follow-up. Age at time of concussion and number of appointments were risk factors. A "golden window" of 2 appointments was identified, highlighting the need of a strong rapport and engagement in shared decision-making. Future directions include prospective studies implementing strategies targeting adolescents and building a strong patient-provider relationship.
这项回顾性研究的目的是通过比较失访患者和完全康复患者,确定与儿科患者脑震荡后康复失访相关的因素。
这项回顾性单中心队列研究分析了一家安全网医院儿科脑震荡诊所连续就诊的140例患者的失访情况,失访定义为在最后一次预约时未达到康复标准。对包括人口统计学、脑震荡的机制和严重程度以及脑震荡后首次评估和随访管理特征等感兴趣的变量进行单变量和多变量回归模型分析。
在样本中,40%(n = 56)达到康复标准,60%(n = 84)失访。中位年龄为15岁(四分位间距11 - 17岁),以男性为主(60.7%)。与亲生父母同住(比值比 = 0.145,95%置信区间 = 0.028 - 0.760)和参与体育运动(比值比 = 0.256,95%置信区间 = 0.092 - 0.764)是保护因素,而年龄在10岁及以上(比值比 = 13.466,95%置信区间 = 2.792 - 64.958)和随访预约次数为2次或更少(比值比 = 19.027,95%置信区间 = 4.991 - 72.533)是失访的危险因素。在性别、种族、驾车距离、保险类型和损伤机制方面未发现显著差异。
与亲生父母同住和参与体育运动是失访的保护因素。脑震荡时的年龄和预约次数是危险因素。确定了2次预约的“黄金窗口”,突出了建立密切关系和参与共同决策的必要性。未来的方向包括开展针对青少年的前瞻性研究以及建立牢固的医患关系。