Giridharan Divya Lakshmi, Gopal Suma
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Vokkaligara Sangha Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Oct;17(10):1129-1134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2977.
This study aims to compare the fracture resistance force (FRF) and failure types of three-dimensional (3D)-printed stainless steel crowns (SSCs) and preformed SSCs in primary molars.
Forty-eight over-retained and extracted mandibular second deciduous molars were divided into two groups: one receiving 3D-printed crowns and the other preformed crowns. Fracture resistance testing was performed using a universal mechanical testing machine, and failure types were analyzed post-testing.
Fracture resistance testing revealed a significant difference between 3D-printed and preformed SSCs ( < 0.05), with 3D-printed crowns exhibiting a mean FRF of 3953.82 N compared to 742.94 N for preformed crowns. Additionally, Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-squared tests were utilized to examine variations within and across the groups. Analysis of shear bond strength showed that 3D-printed crowns demonstrated superior adhesive performance compared to preformed crowns, with mean shear bond strength values of 3953.82 N and 742.94 N, respectively. Both groups A and B showed unrepairable failure modes.
The study concludes that 3D-printed SSCs offer distinct advantages over preformed options, including tailored fit, enhanced mechanical properties, and improved longevity. These findings underscore the potential of 3D printing technology to revolutionize pediatric dental restoration practices.
Integrating 3D printing into pediatric dental practice holds promise for optimizing treatment outcomes and improving long-term oral health in children. The superior fracture resistance and adhesive performance of 3D-printed crowns suggest their potential to enhance restoration viability and reduce the need for subsequent interventions.
Giridharan DL, Gopal S. Comparison of Fracture Resistance Force (Load-to-fractured Test) and Failure Type of 3D-printed Stainless Steel Crowns and Preformed Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Molars: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1129-1134.
本研究旨在比较三维(3D)打印不锈钢冠(SSC)和预成不锈钢冠在乳磨牙中的抗折力(FRF)及失败类型。
将48颗过度保留且已拔除的下颌第二乳磨牙分为两组:一组接受3D打印冠修复,另一组接受预成冠修复。使用万能机械试验机进行抗折力测试,并在测试后分析失败类型。
抗折力测试显示3D打印SSC和预成SSC之间存在显著差异(<0.05),3D打印冠的平均抗折力为3953.82N,而预成冠为742.94N。此外,使用曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验来检查组内和组间的差异。剪切粘结强度分析表明,3D打印冠相比预成冠表现出更好的粘结性能,平均剪切粘结强度值分别为3953.82N和742.94N。A组和B组均显示出不可修复的失败模式。
该研究得出结论,3D打印SSC比预成冠具有明显优势,包括贴合度更佳、机械性能增强和使用寿命延长。这些发现强调了3D打印技术在革新儿童牙科修复实践方面的潜力。
将3D打印技术融入儿童牙科实践有望优化治疗效果并改善儿童的长期口腔健康。3D打印冠优越的抗折力和粘结性能表明它们有潜力提高修复体的生存能力并减少后续干预的需求。
Giridharan DL, Gopal S. 乳磨牙中3D打印不锈钢冠和预成不锈钢冠的抗折力(断裂负荷测试)及失败类型比较:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科杂志》2024;17(10):1129 - 113