• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习检测全球导航卫星系统中的结构化干扰。

Leveraging machine learning for the detection of structured interference in Global Navigation Satellite Systems.

作者信息

Nabi Imtiaz, Farooq Salma Zainab, Saeed Sunnyaha, Irtaza Syed Ali, Shehzad Khurram, Arif Mohammad, Khan Inayat, Ahmad Shafiq

机构信息

National Center of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Department of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Nov 11;10:e2399. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2399. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2399
PMID:39650340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11623110/
Abstract

Radio frequency interference disrupts services offered by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Spoofing is the transmission of structured interference signals intended to deceive GNSS location and timing services. The identification of spoofing is vital, especially for safety-of-life aviation services, since the receiver is unaware of counterfeit signals. Although numerous spoofing detection and mitigation techniques have been developed, spoofing attacks are becoming more sophisticated, limiting most of these methods. This study explores the application of machine learning techniques for discerning authentic signals from counterfeit ones. The investigation particularly focuses on the secure code estimation and replay (SCER) spoofing attack, one of the most challenging type of spoofing attacks, ds8 scenario of the Texas Spoofing Test Battery (TEXBAT) dataset. The proposed framework uses tracking data from delay lock loop correlators as intrinsic features to train four distinct machine learning (ML) models: logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM) classifier, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and decision tree. The models are trained employing a random six-fold cross-validation methodology. It can be observed that both logistic regression and SVM can detect spoofing with a mean F1-score of 94%. However, logistic regression provides 165dB gain in terms of time efficiency as compared to SVM and 3 better than decision tree-based classifier. These performance metrics as well as receiver operating characteristic curve analysis make logistic regression the desirable approach for identifying SCER structured interference.

摘要

射频干扰会扰乱全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)提供的服务。欺骗是指传输结构化干扰信号,旨在欺骗GNSS的定位和定时服务。欺骗的识别至关重要,特别是对于生命安全航空服务,因为接收器无法识别伪造信号。尽管已经开发了许多欺骗检测和缓解技术,但欺骗攻击正变得越来越复杂,限制了大多数这些方法的有效性。本研究探讨了机器学习技术在辨别真实信号与伪造信号方面的应用。该调查特别关注安全码估计与重放(SCER)欺骗攻击,这是最具挑战性的欺骗攻击类型之一,使用得克萨斯欺骗测试电池(TEXBAT)数据集的ds8场景。所提出的框架使用来自延迟锁定环相关器的跟踪数据作为内在特征,来训练四种不同的机器学习(ML)模型:逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)分类器、K近邻(KNN)和决策树。这些模型采用随机六折交叉验证方法进行训练。可以观察到,逻辑回归和SVM都能以94%的平均F1分数检测到欺骗。然而,与SVM相比,逻辑回归在时间效率方面提供了165dB的增益,并且比基于决策树的分类器高出3dB。这些性能指标以及接收器操作特性曲线分析使得逻辑回归成为识别SCER结构化干扰的理想方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/05860e4349c6/peerj-cs-10-2399-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/6a3d9dcbf03b/peerj-cs-10-2399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/9e98282c9b83/peerj-cs-10-2399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/0d68b1f6f1ba/peerj-cs-10-2399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/1573096e4d82/peerj-cs-10-2399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/e3aabcf3c1e5/peerj-cs-10-2399-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/dc5aa84b71ed/peerj-cs-10-2399-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/d8858c08ae9d/peerj-cs-10-2399-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/64dc69918e74/peerj-cs-10-2399-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/1cf83ec6f480/peerj-cs-10-2399-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/05860e4349c6/peerj-cs-10-2399-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/6a3d9dcbf03b/peerj-cs-10-2399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/9e98282c9b83/peerj-cs-10-2399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/0d68b1f6f1ba/peerj-cs-10-2399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/1573096e4d82/peerj-cs-10-2399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/e3aabcf3c1e5/peerj-cs-10-2399-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/dc5aa84b71ed/peerj-cs-10-2399-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/d8858c08ae9d/peerj-cs-10-2399-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/64dc69918e74/peerj-cs-10-2399-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/1cf83ec6f480/peerj-cs-10-2399-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd90/11623110/05860e4349c6/peerj-cs-10-2399-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging machine learning for the detection of structured interference in Global Navigation Satellite Systems.利用机器学习检测全球导航卫星系统中的结构化干扰。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Nov 11;10:e2399. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2399. eCollection 2024.
2
Satellite Fingerprinting Methods for GNSS Spoofing Detection.用于全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)欺骗检测的卫星指纹识别方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 1;24(23):7698. doi: 10.3390/s24237698.
3
GNSS Spoofing Detection by Supervised Machine Learning with Validation on Real-World Meaconing and Spoofing Data-Part II.通过监督式机器学习进行GNSS欺骗检测及在实际转发和欺骗数据上的验证 - 第二部分
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 25;20(7):1806. doi: 10.3390/s20071806.
4
GNSS Spoofing Detection and Mitigation Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation.基于最大似然估计的全球导航卫星系统欺骗检测与缓解
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 30;17(7):1532. doi: 10.3390/s17071532.
5
Use of Supervised Machine Learning for GNSS Signal Spoofing Detection with Validation on Real-World Meaconing and Spoofing Data-Part I.基于真实转发和欺骗数据的 GNSS 信号欺骗检测的监督机器学习方法——第一部分。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 20;20(4):1171. doi: 10.3390/s20041171.
6
Spoofing Detection Using GNSS/INS/Odometer Coupling for Vehicular Navigation.用于车辆导航的基于全球导航卫星系统/惯性导航系统/里程计耦合的欺骗检测
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Apr 24;18(5):1305. doi: 10.3390/s18051305.
7
Detection of Induced GNSS Spoofing Using S-Curve-Bias.利用 S 曲线偏置检测诱导的 GNSS 欺骗。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 22;19(4):922. doi: 10.3390/s19040922.
8
A Two-Stage Interference Suppression Scheme Based on Antenna Array for GNSS Jamming and Spoofing.基于天线阵列的 GNSS 干扰和欺骗的两级干扰抑制方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 7;19(18):3870. doi: 10.3390/s19183870.
9
Spoofing Detection Algorithm Based on Pseudorange Differences.基于伪距差分的欺骗检测算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 21;18(10):3197. doi: 10.3390/s18103197.
10
Spoofing attack recognition for GNSS-based train positioning using a BO-LightGBM method.基于BO-LightGBM方法的GNSS列车定位欺骗攻击识别
Sci Prog. 2024 Oct-Dec;107(4):368504241272731. doi: 10.1177/00368504241272731.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-Cost COTS GNSS Interference Monitoring, Detection, and Classification System.低成本商用现货 GNSS 干扰监测、检测和分类系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 25;23(7):3452. doi: 10.3390/s23073452.
2
On GPS spoofing of aerial platforms: a review of threats, challenges, methodologies, and future research directions.论空中平台的全球定位系统欺骗:威胁、挑战、方法及未来研究方向综述
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 May 6;7:e507. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.507. eCollection 2021.