Suppr超能文献

探索生物制剂对预防实验性牙周炎的影响:基于动物研究的系统评价

Exploring the Impact of Biological Agents on Protecting Against Experimental Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of Animal-Based Studies.

作者信息

Oliveira Gabriela Ezequiel, da Silva Barbirato Davi, de Menezes Bruna Silva, Fuly Milenna Silva, Pelegrine Henrique Cassebe Ledo, Bonilha Debora Caliendo, de Alencar Julia Gabrielle Pereira, Theodoro Leticia Helena, de Molon Rafael Scaf

机构信息

Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Aracatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.

Department of Basic and Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FORP/USP) 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2024 Dec 2;2024:1716735. doi: 10.1155/bmri/1716735. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This systematic review was aimed at addressing the focused question: What is the protective potential of biological agents against alveolar bone resorption during the progression of experimental periodontitis (EP)? The study protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework database (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/3P2HY). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase databases up to December 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of preclinical studies in animal models of EP that examined the effects of biological agents on preventing periodontal bone loss and reducing tissue inflammation. Studies were excluded if they (i) used non-EP animal models; (ii) focused on antimicrobial agents; (iii) centered on prebiotics or probiotics; (iv) evaluated compounds not classified as biologicals; or (v) included randomized clinical trials, clinical studies, or reviews. Eligibility was determined based on the PI/ECOs framework, and study quality was assessed using the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool. After screening an initial pool of 5236 records from databases, registries, and hand searches, 39 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 biological agents were evaluated across these studies. The majority of studies employed the ligature-induced model of EP to test the effectiveness of biologicals as preventive or therapeutic interventions. The dosage of biological agents and the duration of disease induction varied depending on the EP model. In all studies, the main outcome-alveolar bone loss, a hallmark of EP-was significantly inhibited by biological agents, which also reduced proinflammatory mediators when compared to untreated controls. A key strength of this review is the high number of studies included, most of which were classified as having low risk of bias. However, a notable limitation is the absence of a meta-analysis, the short follow-up periods in the included studies, and the heterogeneity among the compound dosages and route of administration. This systematic review demonstrates that biological agents are effective in reducing bone loss and mitigating inflammation during EP progression. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings in human populations.

摘要

本系统评价旨在解决以下重点问题

在实验性牙周炎(EP)进展过程中,生物制剂对牙槽骨吸收的保护潜力如何?该研究方案已在开放科学框架数据库中注册(doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/3P2HY)。截至2023年12月,在PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、Scopus和Embase数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。纳入标准包括在EP动物模型中的临床前研究,这些研究考察了生物制剂对预防牙周骨丢失和减轻组织炎症的作用。如果研究(i)使用非EP动物模型;(ii)聚焦于抗菌剂;(iii)以益生元或益生菌为中心;(iv)评估未归类为生物制剂的化合物;或(v)包括随机临床试验、临床研究或综述,则将其排除。根据PI/ECOs框架确定纳入资格,并使用SYRCLE偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。在对数据库、注册库和手工检索得到的5236条初始记录进行筛选后,39项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究共评估了23种生物制剂。大多数研究采用结扎诱导的EP模型来测试生物制剂作为预防或治疗干预措施的有效性。生物制剂的剂量和疾病诱导的持续时间因EP模型而异。在所有研究中,EP的标志性指标——牙槽骨丢失这一主要结局均被生物制剂显著抑制,与未治疗的对照组相比,生物制剂还降低了促炎介质水平。本综述的一个关键优势是纳入的研究数量众多,其中大多数被归类为偏倚风险较低。然而,一个显著的局限性是缺乏荟萃分析、纳入研究的随访期较短以及化合物剂量和给药途径之间存在异质性。本系统评价表明,生物制剂在EP进展过程中能有效减少骨丢失并减轻炎症。需要进行随机临床试验以在人群中证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ea2/11628168/a57e88627460/BMRI2024-1716735.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验