Kalkur Roshni S, Hintz John P, Pathangey Girish, Manning Katharine A
Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 25;11:1481513. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1481513. eCollection 2024.
Heart failure (HF) burdens the US healthcare system, with annual costs exceeding $30 billion. Outpatient intravenous (OP IV) diuresis in clinic or home settings may potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs, though limited data exists. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of OP IV diuresis in managing decompensated HF as a hospitalization alternative.
Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this systematic review used MeSH terms in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Central. From 16 selected studies, 15 were single-center; 6 prospective, 9 retrospective; and 1 was a randomized trial comparing OP IV diuresis to oral home regimen. Demographics, visit data, and outcomes were collected, and 30-day outcomes were compared to inpatient IV (IP IV) diuresis from 2021 Medicare HF hospitalizations.
The review included 1,590 unique patients treated with OP IV diuretics, with a mean age of 70 ± 6 years, 69.7% male, and 74.8% NYHA III-IV. Minimal adverse post-diuresis events such as hypokalemia, hypotension, and worsening renal function occurred (4.5%, 0.7%, and 2.3% respectively). Post-visit mean weight loss was -2.2 ± 1.1 kg. The 30-day readmission rate for OP IV diuresis was significantly lower than IP IV diuresis (20.0% vs. 22.6%; = 0.0.401), and 30-day mortality was also lower (5.6% vs. 10.7%; = 0.003).
OP IV diuresis is a safe and effective treatment for decompensated HF with minimal risk of adverse events. Data demonstrate reduced 30-day readmission, mortality rates, cost. These findings highlight the potential of OP IV diuresis as an enhanced alternative HF care; however, further randomized control trials are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.
心力衰竭(HF)给美国医疗系统带来沉重负担,每年成本超过300亿美元。在诊所或家庭环境中进行门诊静脉(OP IV)利尿可能会改善治疗效果并降低成本,不过相关数据有限。本系统评价评估了OP IV利尿作为住院替代方案治疗失代偿性HF的安全性、有效性和治疗效果。
遵循PRISMA 2020指南,本系统评价在MEDLINE、SCOPUS、CINAHL Complete和Cochrane Central中使用医学主题词。从16项入选研究中,15项为单中心研究;6项为前瞻性研究,9项为回顾性研究;1项为随机试验,比较OP IV利尿与口服家庭治疗方案。收集了人口统计学、就诊数据和治疗效果,并将30天治疗效果与2021年医疗保险HF住院患者的住院静脉(IP IV)利尿进行比较。
该评价纳入了1590例接受OP IV利尿剂治疗的独特患者,平均年龄为70±6岁,男性占69.7%,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III-IV级患者占74.8%。利尿后发生低钾血症、低血压和肾功能恶化等轻微不良事件的比例分别为4.5%、0.7%和2.3%。就诊后平均体重减轻-2.2±1.1kg。OP IV利尿的30天再入院率显著低于IP IV利尿(20.0%对22.6%;P=0.0401),30天死亡率也较低(5.6%对10.7%;P=0.003)。
OP IV利尿是治疗失代偿性HF的一种安全有效的治疗方法,不良事件风险极小。数据表明30天再入院率、死亡率和成本降低。这些发现突出了OP IV利尿作为一种强化HF护理替代方案的潜力;然而,需要进一步的随机对照试验来评估长期治疗效果。