Forsythe Desiree, Hsu Jeremy L
Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):e0014424. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00144-24. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Institutions of higher education play a major role in teaching undergraduate students. Historically, most courses have been taught by tenure-track (TT) faculty who may also be responsible for research or scholarly activities. However, a recent shift from "teaching-intensive" TT faculty to "teaching-only" contingent faculty off the tenure track has highlighted the importance of understanding the experiences of contingent faculty. While there have been an increasing number of studies examining the experiences of part-time contingent faculty, few studies have directly surveyed the increasing number of full-time, non-tenure-track (NTT) teaching faculty in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to capture their experiences, nor are we aware of any study that has examined the roles of NTT teaching faculty within one discipline to examine any potential disciplinary differences that may arise across STEM fields. Here, we focus on the experiences of full-time, non-tenure-track faculty in biology whose primary responsibility is teaching. We conducted a random stratified sampling of institutions using the Carnegie classifications to identify potential full-time NTT teaching faculty at over 10% of all institutions in the United States. Our results from surveying these faculty found both positive and negative themes, including (i) NTT teaching faculty being less diverse than the STEM professoriate at large; (ii) NTT teaching faculty reporting mixed feelings on institutional support, identifying a range of opportunities to better support NTT teaching faculty; (iii) NTT teaching faculty often having limited participation in voting for department and institutional matters and reporting mixed feelings of belonging and value; and (iv) NTT teaching faculty having high amounts of autonomy over their teaching but still struggling in key areas. We end with specific implications and recommendations for our field to better support NTT teaching faculty in biology.
高等教育机构在本科生教学中发挥着重要作用。从历史上看,大多数课程由终身教职(TT)教师授课,他们可能还负责研究或学术活动。然而,最近从“教学密集型”的终身教职教师向非终身教职的“只负责教学”的临时教师的转变,凸显了了解临时教师经历的重要性。虽然越来越多的研究考察了兼职临时教师的经历,但很少有研究直接调查科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域中越来越多的全职、非终身教职(NTT)教师以了解他们的经历,我们也不知道有任何研究考察了NTT教师在一个学科内的角色,以探究STEM领域可能出现的任何潜在学科差异。在此,我们关注主要负责教学的生物学全职、非终身教职教师的经历。我们使用卡内基分类法对机构进行随机分层抽样,以确定美国超过10%的机构中的潜在全职NTT教师。我们对这些教师的调查结果发现了积极和消极的主题,包括:(i)NTT教师的多样性低于整个STEM教授群体;(ii)NTT教师对机构支持的感受不一,确定了一系列更好支持NTT教师的机会;(iii)NTT教师在部门和机构事务投票中的参与度往往有限,归属感和价值感也不一;(iv)NTT教师在教学方面有很大的自主权,但在关键领域仍面临困难。我们最后针对我们的领域提出了具体的影响和建议,以更好地支持生物学领域的NTT教师。