Fairley Jessica L, Hansen Dylan, Proudman Susanna, Sahhar Joanne, Ngian Gene-Siew, Walker Jennifer, Host Lauren V, Stevens Wendy, Nikpour Mandana, Ross Laura
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;44(1):305-317. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07253-3. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: To identify the frequency, correlates and progression of frailty in systemic sclerosis (SSc).
All Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants meeting ACR/EULAR criteria with a calculable FRAIL Scale score were included. FRAIL Scale scores were calculated annually and were used to group participants as 'robust', 'pre-frail' or 'frail'. Progression of frailty over time was examined by comparing first-recorded, highest-recorded and last-recorded FRAIL Scale scores for each participant. Determinants of frailty at each visit were evaluated with ordinal logistic regression. Survival was analysed using Cox hazard modelling.
Of 1703 participants, 14% and 53% met criteria for frailty or pre-frailty respectively, with 33% consistently robust. Among initially frail participants, 40% remained frail and 60% improved to pre-frailty/robustness. Of pre-frail participants, 15% became frail while 32% improved to robustness. One-third of initially robust participants progressed to pre-frailty/frailty. SSc-specific determinants of frailty included diffuse SSc (odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.8, p < 0.01), pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR 7.1, 95% CI 5.1-9.9, p < 0.01), interstitial lung disease (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, p < 0.01), proximal weakness (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p < 0.01) and lower-tract gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, p < 0.01). Older age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.01), raised CRP (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.0, p < 0.01) and anaemia (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7, p < 0.01) were also significantly associated with frailty. A graded risk of death was observed with the diagnosis of pre-frailty and frailty states (hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, 95% CI 2.6-4.8, p < 0.01; and HR 9.8, 95% CI 6.8-14.1, p < 0.01 respectively). Frailty and pre-frailty were associated with reduced health-related quality-of-life and physical function (p < 0.05).
Frailty and pre-frailty are common in SSc and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Both SSc and non-SSc determinants of frailty exist. Frailty in SSc is a dynamic phenomenon with potential to deteriorate or improve over time.
引言/目的:确定系统性硬化症(SSc)患者中衰弱的发生率、相关因素及病情进展情况。
纳入所有符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)标准且可计算衰弱量表(FRAIL Scale)评分的澳大利亚硬皮病队列研究参与者。每年计算FRAIL Scale评分,并将参与者分为“健康”“衰弱前期”或“衰弱”。通过比较每位参与者首次记录、最高记录和末次记录的FRAIL Scale评分,研究衰弱随时间的进展情况。每次随访时使用有序逻辑回归评估衰弱的决定因素。采用Cox风险模型分析生存率。
1703名参与者中,分别有14%和53%符合衰弱或衰弱前期标准,33%始终保持健康。在最初衰弱的参与者中,40%仍为衰弱状态,60%改善为衰弱前期/健康状态。在衰弱前期参与者中,15%发展为衰弱,32%改善为健康状态。三分之一最初健康的参与者进展为衰弱前期/衰弱状态。SSc特异性衰弱决定因素包括弥漫性SSc(比值比(OR)1.4,95%置信区间(CI)1.1 - 1.8,p < 0.01)、肺动脉高压(OR 7.1,95% CI 5.1 - 9.9,p < 0.01)、间质性肺疾病(OR 1.6,95% CI 1.3 - 2.0,p < 0.01)、近端肌无力(OR 1.5,95% CI 1.2 - 2.0,p < 0.01)和下消化道胃肠道症状(OR 1.5,95% CI 1.3 - 1.8,p < 0.01)。年龄较大(OR 1.1,95% CI 1.1 - 1.2,p < 0.01)、C反应蛋白升高(OR 1.7,95% CI 1.4 - 2.0,p < 0.01)和贫血(OR 1.4,95% CI 1.2 - 1.7,p < 0.01)也与衰弱显著相关。诊断为衰弱前期和衰弱状态时观察到分级死亡风险(风险比(HR)分别为3.5,95% CI 2.6 - 4.8,p < 0.01;HR 9.8,95% CI 6.8 - 14.1,p < 0.01)。衰弱和衰弱前期与健康相关生活质量及身体功能下降相关(p < 0.05)。
衰弱和衰弱前期在SSc患者中常见,且与发病率和死亡率相关。存在SSc特异性和非SSc特异性的衰弱决定因素。SSc中的衰弱是一种动态现象,随时间推移可能恶化或改善。