Slob Bart, Fens Tanja, Weersma Maaike, Postma Maarten, Boersma Cornelis, de Jong Lisa
Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Health-Ecore Ltd, Groningen/ Zeist, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0315509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315509. eCollection 2024.
The recent EMPA-KIDNEY trial showed evidence for preventing disease progression in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with empagliflozin. It is however yet unknown if use of empagliflozin is cost effective in the Netherlands. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of empagliflozin in adult patients with CKD in the Netherlands.
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a Markov state microsimulation model, simulating kidney progression of CKD patients with eGFR <90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 comparing empagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) and SoC alone. KDIGO classification was used to describe the risk of CKD progression. The input data were taken from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial (baseline characteristics, treatment effect, and utilities), and published data and national sources were used for general population mortality, treatment and event costs. The analyses were performed from a societal perspective with applying a lifetime horizon. Discounting was done according to the Dutch pharmacoeconomic guidelines. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the impact of uncertainty around the input parameters.
The base-case results showed total discounted costs for empagliflozin plus SoC and SoC alone of €200,193 and €234,574 respectively, indicating total savings of €34,380. Empagliflozin plus SoC was associated with higher total discounted health benefits of 11.06 life years (LYs) and 9.01 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), compared with 9.74 LYs and 7.79 QALYs for SoC alone, resulting in an additional 1.31 LYs and 1.22 QALYs for empagliflozin plus SoC. Empagliflozin plus SoC is a dominant alternative compared to SoC alone. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings and conclusion.
Using empagliflozin in addition to SoC in adult patients with CKD is likely to be cost saving compared to the current SoC in the Netherlands, irrespective of diabetes status and albuminuria.
近期的EMPA - KIDNEY试验显示,恩格列净可有效预防成年慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的疾病进展。然而,在荷兰使用恩格列净是否具有成本效益尚不清楚。我们旨在评估恩格列净在荷兰成年CKD患者中的成本效益。
采用马尔可夫状态微观模拟模型进行成本效益分析,模拟估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<90 ml/(min·1.73 m²)的CKD患者的肾脏进展情况,比较恩格列净联合标准治疗(SoC)与单纯标准治疗的效果。采用改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)分类法描述CKD进展风险。输入数据取自EMPA - KIDNEY试验(基线特征、治疗效果和效用),一般人群死亡率、治疗及事件成本数据则来源于已发表的数据和国家资料。分析从社会角度进行,采用终身视角。根据荷兰药物经济学指南进行贴现。将增量成本效益比(ICER)与每质量调整生命年(QALY)50,000欧元的支付意愿阈值进行比较。进行确定性和概率敏感性分析,以探究输入参数不确定性的影响。
基础病例结果显示,恩格列净联合SoC和单纯SoC的总贴现成本分别为2,001,93欧元和2,345,74欧元,表明节省总成本34,380欧元。与单纯SoC的9.74个生命年(LYs)和7.79个质量调整生命年(QALYs)相比,恩格列净联合SoC具有更高的总贴现健康效益,分别为11.06个生命年和9.01个质量调整生命年,恩格列净联合SoC额外增加了1.31个生命年和1.22个质量调整生命年。与单纯SoC相比,恩格列净联合SoC是更具优势的选择。敏感性分析证实了研究结果和结论的稳健性。
在荷兰,成年CKD患者在标准治疗基础上加用恩格列净,与目前的标准治疗相比,无论糖尿病状态和蛋白尿情况如何,都可能节省成本。