• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依帕列净治疗伴心血管风险升高的希腊 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Greece.

机构信息

Evroston LP, Athens, Greece.

Diabetes Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Konstantopouleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2018 May;38(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x.

DOI:10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x
PMID:29349708
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently associated with co-morbidities that exacerbate cardiovascular (CV) risk. CV disease is the leading cause of death in people with diabetes across the world and accounts for approximately half the deaths in the T2DM population. Hence, the objective of present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin, in addition to standard of care (SoC), for the treatment of adult patients with T2DM and high CV risk in Greece.

METHODS

A health economic model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes of patients receiving empagliflozin plus SoC compared with those receiving SoC alone over a lifetime horizon. CV and renal event rates were derived from patient level data from the EMPA-REG-OUTCOME trial by fitting time-dependent parametric survival functions. 5000 individual patient profiles randomly sampled from the trial were simulated using a time-to-event approach. Model extrapolated outcomes included life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Following a Greek third-party payer perspective, only direct medical costs related to drug acquisition as well as fatal and non-fatal diabetes-related complications were considered (€2016). Cost units and utility data were extracted from the literature and publicly available official sources. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data.

RESULTS

Over a patient's lifetime, empagliflozin was predicted to result in longer mean survival (14.01 LY vs. 11.87 LY with SoC) and reduced rate of clinical events accumulating 7.75 QALYs versus 6.83 QALYs on SoC alone at additional costs of €4235. The generated ICER of empagliflozin was €4633 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed empagliflozin's cost-effective profile. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained, probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that empagliflozin was estimated to have a 100% probability of being cost-effective relative to SoC.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin added to SoC was estimated to be a highly cost-effective treatment option for the treatment of T2DM in adults with increased CV disease risk in Greece.

摘要

背景与目的

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)常伴有使心血管(CV)风险恶化的合并症。CV 疾病是全球糖尿病患者死亡的主要原因,约占 T2DM 人群死亡人数的一半。因此,本研究旨在评估恩格列净除标准治疗(SoC)以外,用于治疗希腊 T2DM 合并高 CV 风险成人患者的成本效益。

方法

使用健康经济学模型预测接受恩格列净联合 SoC 治疗的患者与单独接受 SoC 治疗的患者在终生内的临床和经济结局。CV 和肾脏事件发生率来自 EMPA-REG-OUTCOME 试验的患者水平数据,通过拟合时依赖参数生存函数得出。使用事件时间方法对来自试验的 5000 名随机抽样的个体患者进行模拟。模型外推结果包括寿命年(LY)、质量调整寿命年(QALY)、成本和增量成本效益比(ICER)。基于希腊第三方支付者的观点,仅考虑与药物获得以及致命和非致命糖尿病相关并发症相关的直接医疗成本(2016 欧元)。成本单位和效用数据取自文献和公开的官方来源。敏感性分析探讨了输入数据变化的影响。

结果

在患者的一生中,预计恩格列净治疗将导致更长的平均寿命(恩格列净治疗为 14.01LY,SoC 治疗为 11.87LY),并减少单独使用 SoC 时累计 7.75QALY 的临床事件发生率,而单独使用 SoC 的成本为 4235 欧元。恩格列净的 ICER 为每获得 1QALY 增加 4633 欧元。单因素敏感性分析证实了恩格列净的成本效益特征。在定义的每获得 1QALY 支付意愿阈值为 34000 欧元时,概率敏感性分析表明,与 SoC 相比,恩格列净估计有 100%的概率具有成本效益。

结论

在希腊,与 SoC 相比,恩格列净联合 SoC 治疗估计是治疗 T2DM 合并高 CV 疾病风险成人患者的一种极具成本效益的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Greece.依帕列净治疗伴心血管风险升高的希腊 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 May;38(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin Compared with Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Cardiovascular Disease in Greece.恩格列净与达格列净治疗希腊 2 型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Apr;41(4):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01013-w. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Cost-utility of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.恩格列净在心血管高危 2 型糖尿病患者中的成本效用分析。
J Diabetes Complications. 2018 Feb;32(2):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.在希腊,达格列净作为二甲双胍的附加药物用于治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):649-59. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0410-2.
5
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin in Japan Based on Results From the Asian subpopulation in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.基于 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验亚洲亚组人群的结果对恩格列净在日本的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2021-2040.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.恩格列净与卡格列净、达格列净或标准治疗方案相比在2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001313.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States: Findings Based on the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.恩格列净治疗美国糖尿病肾病患者的成本效果:基于 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验的研究结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Jun;79(6):796-806. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin compared with liraglutide based on cardiovascular outcome trials in Type II diabetes.恩格列净与利拉鲁肽比较的成本效益:基于 2 型糖尿病心血管结局试验。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Aug;9(11):781-794. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0071. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin treatment in people with Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.恩格列净治疗在 EMPA-REG OUTCOME 试验中患有 2 型糖尿病和已确诊心血管疾病的患者的成本效益分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1494-1502. doi: 10.1111/dme.14076. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
Cost Effectiveness of Exenatide Once Weekly Versus Insulin Glargine and Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.每周一次艾塞那肽对比甘精胰岛素和利拉鲁肽治疗希腊 2 型糖尿病的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jan;38(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0586-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The Economic Cost of Obesity: A Cost-of-Illness Study in Greece.肥胖的经济成本:希腊的疾病成本研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-01002-6.
2
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
3
Applications of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycaemic control.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Greece.希腊利伐沙班治疗深静脉血栓和肺栓塞的成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Sep;37(9):833-844. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0540-1.
2
EQ-5D Scores for Diabetes-Related Comorbidities.糖尿病相关合并症的EQ-5D评分
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):1002-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
The prevalence and treatment patterns of diabetes in the Greek population based on real-world data from the nation-wide prescription database.
SGLT2 抑制剂在血糖控制之外的应用。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024 Aug;20(8):513-529. doi: 10.1038/s41581-024-00836-y. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors in a Real-World Population: A MICADO Model-Based Analysis Using Routine Data from a GP Registry.SGLT2 抑制剂在真实世界人群中的成本效益:基于常规数据的 GP 注册处的 MICADO 模型分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Oct;41(10):1249-1262. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
5
CELESTIA: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Greece.塞莱提亚:恩格列净与西他列汀治疗希腊2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Feb 17;15:97-109. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S400522. eCollection 2023.
6
Model-based predictions on health benefits and budget impact of implementing empagliflozin in people with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.基于模型的预测:在患有 2 型糖尿病和已确诊心血管疾病的人群中实施恩格列净的健康获益和预算影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Mar;25(3):748-757. doi: 10.1111/dom.14921. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Baseline Characteristics Associated With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitor Prescriptions in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉赞地区2型糖尿病患者中与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制剂处方相关的基线特征
Cureus. 2022 Apr 19;14(4):e24284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24284. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Cost-effectiveness of second-line empagliflozin versus liraglutide for type 2 diabetes in the United States.美国二线恩格列净与利拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Apr;24(4):652-661. doi: 10.1111/dom.14625. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin as the First-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: Is It Time for a Revolution?钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与二甲双胍作为2型糖尿病一线治疗药物的比较:是时候进行一场变革了吗?
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Apr;37(2):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07249-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease.恩格列净与卡格列净、达格列净或标准治疗方案相比在2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者中的成本效益
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001313.
基于全国处方数据库的真实世界数据,希腊人群中糖尿病的患病率及治疗模式。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;118:162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.在希腊,达格列净作为二甲双胍的附加药物用于治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):649-59. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0410-2.
5
Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial.恩格列净治疗心血管高危2型糖尿病患者的心力衰竭结局:EMPA-REG OUTCOME®试验结果
Eur Heart J. 2016 May 14;37(19):1526-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
6
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.恩格列净:在 2 型糖尿病中的心血管结局和死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
7
Everolimus plus exemestane versus bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Greece: An economic evaluation study.依维莫司联合依西美坦对比贝伐单抗为基础的化疗用于希腊激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌二线治疗的经济学评估研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 5;15:307. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0971-4.
8
Association of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity With Mortality.心脏代谢多重疾病与死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):52-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7008.
9
Probing SGLT2 as a therapeutic target for diabetes: basic physiology and consequences.探索钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)作为糖尿病治疗靶点:基础生理学及影响
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015 Mar;12(2):78-89. doi: 10.1177/1479164114561992. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece.利拉鲁肽与西他列汀或艾塞那肽治疗希腊口服降糖药治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 22;14:419. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-419.