Maxillary protraction anchored on miniplates versus miniscrews: three-dimensional dentoskeletal comparison.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to compare the three-dimensional (3D) outcomes of the novel miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction (MAMP) therapy and the bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) therapy.

METHODS

The sample comprised growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with two skeletal anchored maxillary protraction protocols. The MAMP group comprised 22 patients (9 female, 13 male; 10.9 ± 0.9 years of age at baseline) treated with Class III elastics anchored on a hybrid hyrax expander in the maxilla and two mandibular miniscrews distally to the permanent canines. The BAMP group comprised 24 patients (14 female, 10 male; 11.6 ± 1.1 years of age at baseline) treated with Class III elastic anchored in two titanium miniplates in the infra-zygomatic crest and two miniplates in the mesial of the mandibular permanent canines. Three-dimensional displacements were measured in the pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography scans superimposed on the cranial base using the Slicer Automated Dental Tools module of 3D Slicer software (www.slicer.org). Mean differences (MD) between groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained for all variables. Intergroup comparison was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (P < .05).

RESULTS

Both groups showed improvements after treatment. The MAMP group showed a smaller anterior (MD: -1.09 mm; 95% CI, -2.07 to -0.56) and 3D (MD: -1.27 mm; 95% CI, -2.16 to -0.74) displacements of the maxilla after treatment when compared with BAMP. Both groups showed negligible and similar anteroposterior changes in the mandible (MD: 0.33 mm; 95% CI, -2.15 to 1.34). A greater increase in the nasal cavity width (MD of 2.36; 95% CI, 1.97-3.05) was observed in the MAMP group when compared with BAMP.

LIMITATIONS

The absence of an untreated control group to assess the possible growth impact in these findings is a limitation of this study.

CONCLUSION

Both BAMP and MAMP therapies showed adequate 3D outcomes after treatment. However, BAMP therapy produced a greater maxillary advancement with treatment, while MAMP therapy showed greater transversal increases in the nasal cavity.