Zhao Mirabella, Riis Lene Buhl, Lo Bobby, Attauabi Mohamed, Ovesen Pernille Dige, Wewer Mads Damsgaard, Larsen Lone, Dige Anders, Hvas Christian Lodberg, Poulsen Anja, Christiansen Dagmar, Nagras Zainab Gassem, Dahlin Pernille, Petersen Andreas Munk, Bendtsen Flemming, Seidelin Jakob, Burisch Johan
Gastro Unit - Medical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae287.
Biological treatment failure is common in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but the predictive value of baseline histological activity is unknown.
We aimed to investigate the associations between baseline histological activity and outcomes after biological treatment in patients with UC.
Adult biological-naïve patients with UC (n = 150) were followed prospectively during biological treatment. Histological activity was assessed using the Nancy Index and Geboes score. Endoscopic activity was assessed using the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES). Associations with outcomes were assessed in multivariable models. Associations between histological, endoscopic, and biochemical activity were assessed using Spearman's correlation.
In biological-treated patients with UC, severe histological activity at baseline was independently associated with colectomy risk during the induction period (Nancy 2 vs 4: odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.01-0.61, P = 0.024; Nancy 3 vs 4: OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.63, P = .019; Geboes 3 vs 5: OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00-0.57, P = .033; Geboes 4 vs 5: OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01-0.69, P = 0.032) and total follow-up (Nancy 2 vs 4: HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P = 0.046; Nancy 3 vs 4: HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.47, P = 0.002; Geboes 4 vs 5: HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.93, P = 0.038). Meanwhile, baseline MES was not independently associated with colectomy risk. Histological activity was correlated with MES and the levels of C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, and albumin, but not calprotectin.
Severe histological activity at baseline as characterized by a higher Nancy Index or Geboes score independently predicted colectomy risk in biological-treated UC patients, whereas MES did not. Thus, histological assessment should be encouraged before initiating biological treatment.
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者生物治疗失败很常见,但基线组织学活性的预测价值尚不清楚。
我们旨在研究UC患者基线组织学活性与生物治疗后结局之间的关联。
对150例初治生物制剂的成年UC患者在生物治疗期间进行前瞻性随访。使用南希指数和格博斯评分评估组织学活性。使用梅奥内镜亚评分(MES)评估内镜活性。在多变量模型中评估与结局的关联。使用Spearman相关性评估组织学、内镜和生化活性之间的关联。
在接受生物治疗的UC患者中,基线时严重组织学活性与诱导期结肠切除术风险独立相关(南希2级与4级:比值比[OR]0.18,95%可信区间0.01 - 0.61,P = 0.024;南希3级与4级:OR 0.12,95%可信区间0.02 - 0.63,P = 0.019;格博斯3级与5级:OR 0.06,95%可信区间0.00 - 0.57,P = 0.033;格博斯4级与5级:OR 0.13,95%可信区间0.01 - 0.69,P = 0.032)以及整个随访期(南希2级与4级:风险比[HR]0.23,95%可信区间0.06 - 0.98,P = 0.046;南希3级与4级:HR 0.13,95%可信区间0.04 - 0.47,P = 0.002;格博斯4级与5级:HR 0.28,95%可信区间0.08 - 0.93,P = 0.038)。同时,基线MES与结肠切除术风险无独立关联。组织学活性与MES以及C反应蛋白、血红蛋白和白蛋白水平相关,但与钙卫蛋白无关。
以南希指数或格博斯评分较高为特征的基线严重组织学活性独立预测了接受生物治疗的UC患者的结肠切除术风险,而MES则不然。因此,在开始生物治疗前应鼓励进行组织学评估。