Kam Kai Qian, Chen Tom, Kadri Sameer S, Lawandi Alexander, Yek Christina, Walker Morgan, Warner Sarah, Fram David, Chen Huai-Chun, Shappell Claire N, DelloStritto Laura, Jin Robert, Klompas Michael, Rhee Chanu
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Infectious Disease Service, Department of Pediatrics, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 5;80(1):108-117. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae591.
Little is known about the frequency, hospital-level variation, predictors, and outcomes of antibiotic de-escalation in suspected sepsis.
We retrospectively analyzed adults admitted to 236 US hospitals from 2017-2021 with suspected sepsis (defined by blood culture draw, lactate measurement, and intravenous antibiotic administration) who were initially treated with ≥2 days of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics but had no resistant organisms that required these agents identified through hospital day 4. De-escalation was defined as stopping anti-MRSA and anti-pseudomonal antibiotics or switching to narrower antibiotics by day 4. We created a propensity score for de-escalation using 82 hospital and clinical variables; matched de-escalated to non-de-escalated patients; and assessed associations between de-escalation and outcomes.
Among 124 577 patients, antibiotics were de-escalated in 36 806 (29.5%): narrowing in 27 177 (21.8%), cessation in 9629 (7.7%). De-escalation rates varied between hospitals (median, 29.4%; interquartile range, 21.3%-38.0%). Predictors of de-escalation included less severe disease on day 3-4, positive cultures for nonresistant organisms, and negative/absent MRSA nasal swabs. De-escalation was more common in medium, large, and teaching hospitals in the Northeast and Midwest. De-escalation was associated with lower adjusted risks for acute kidney injury (AKI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], .76-.84), intensive-care unit (ICU) admission after day 4 (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, .52-.66), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, .86-.996).
Antibiotic de-escalation in suspected sepsis is infrequent, variable across hospitals, linked with clinical and microbiologic factors, and associated with lower risk for AKI, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality.
关于疑似脓毒症患者抗生素降阶梯治疗的频率、医院层面的差异、预测因素及结局,目前所知甚少。
我们回顾性分析了2017年至2021年期间入住美国236家医院的成年疑似脓毒症患者(定义为进行血培养、测量乳酸水平并静脉使用抗生素),这些患者最初接受了至少2天的抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和抗假单胞菌抗生素治疗,但在第4个住院日时未发现需要使用这些药物的耐药菌。降阶梯治疗定义为在第4天停止使用抗MRSA和抗假单胞菌抗生素或换用更窄谱的抗生素。我们使用82个医院和临床变量创建了降阶梯治疗的倾向评分;将降阶梯治疗的患者与未降阶梯治疗的患者进行匹配;并评估降阶梯治疗与结局之间的关联。
在124577例患者中,36806例(29.5%)进行了抗生素降阶梯治疗:27177例(21.8%)换用更窄谱抗生素,9629例(7.7%)停药。不同医院之间的降阶梯治疗率有所不同(中位数为29.4%;四分位间距为21.3%-38.0%)。降阶梯治疗的预测因素包括第3至第4天病情较轻、非耐药菌培养阳性以及MRSA鼻拭子检测阴性/未检出。降阶梯治疗在东北部和中西部的中型、大型及教学医院更为常见。降阶梯治疗与急性肾损伤(AKI)的调整后风险较低相关(比值比[OR]为0.80;95%置信区间[CI]为0.76-0.84)、第4天后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的风险较低相关(OR为0.59;95%CI为0.52-0.66)以及院内死亡风险较低相关(OR为0.92;95%CI为0.86-0.996)。
疑似脓毒症患者的抗生素降阶梯治疗并不常见,不同医院之间存在差异,与临床和微生物学因素有关,并且与AKI、入住ICU及院内死亡风险较低相关。