Kobayakawa Tomonori, Nakamura Yukio
Kobayakawa Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Clinic, 1969 Kuno, Fukuroi 437-0061, Japan.
Division of Osteoporosis, Locomotive Syndrome, Joint Disease Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University Yazakokarimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
J Bone Miner Res. 2025 Feb 2;40(2):201-210. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae196.
Upon completing romosozumab therapy for osteoporosis, sequential treatment with other agents is required. However, for patients at high fracture risk despite such therapy, re-administration of romosozumab might be a potent subsequent option to prevent additional fractures. Currently, there is insufficient real-world clinical data verifying the efficacy of romosozumab re-administration. This study evaluated its efficacy. We enrolled 72 osteoporosis patients who remained at high risk of fractures after a 12-mo course of romosozumab, followed by sequential therapy either with bisphosphonates, denosumab, or teriparatide. Patients were re-administered another 12-mo romosozumab to assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and the percentages of patients achieving a T-score > -2.5 at the completion. Our result exhibited that BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck increased significantly through the re-administration phase (p < .001). The percentage of patients achieving a T-score > -2.5 in the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck increased significantly compared to before initial romosozumab therapy, with the greatest improvement seen after re-administration (all p < .001). Bone formation markers increased significantly (p < .001) during re-administration, while resorption markers showed no significant change (p = .408). The impact of prior sequential therapy was also evaluated. BMD increased significantly at all sites for patients who received bisphosphonates as sequential therapy (p < .05). After denosumab therapy, significant BMD increases were observed only in the lumbar spine (p < .01), while the total hip and femoral neck showed no significant change. After teriparatide therapy, BMD temporarily decreased during the sequential period but increased significantly after romosozumab re-administration, especially in the lumbar spine and femoral neck (both p < .001). In conclusion, romosozumab re-administration is an effective treatment. Furthermore, its efficacy varies depending on the sequential therapy used, with the highest effectiveness seen in the order of teriparatide, bisphosphonates, and denosumab.
在完成针对骨质疏松症的罗莫佐单抗治疗后,需要用其他药物进行序贯治疗。然而,对于尽管接受了此类治疗但骨折风险仍高的患者,再次使用罗莫佐单抗可能是预防更多骨折的有效后续选择。目前,尚无足够的真实世界临床数据证实再次使用罗莫佐单抗的疗效。本研究评估了其疗效。我们纳入了72例骨质疏松症患者,这些患者在接受了12个月的罗莫佐单抗治疗后,骨折风险仍然很高,随后接受了双膦酸盐、地诺单抗或特立帕肽的序贯治疗。患者再次接受了12个月的罗莫佐单抗治疗,以评估骨密度(BMD)的变化以及在治疗结束时T值>-2.5的患者百分比。我们的结果显示,在再次给药阶段,腰椎和股骨颈的骨密度显著增加(p<0.001)。与初始罗莫佐单抗治疗前相比,腰椎、全髋和股骨颈T值>-2.5的患者百分比显著增加,再次给药后改善最为明显(所有p<0.001)。再次给药期间,骨形成标志物显著增加(p<0.001),而骨吸收标志物无显著变化(p = 0.408)。还评估了先前序贯治疗的影响。接受双膦酸盐作为序贯治疗的患者,所有部位的骨密度均显著增加(p<0.05)。地诺单抗治疗后,仅在腰椎观察到骨密度显著增加(p<0.01),而全髋和股骨颈无显著变化。特立帕肽治疗后,序贯治疗期间骨密度暂时降低,但再次使用罗莫佐单抗后显著增加,尤其是在腰椎和股骨颈(两者p<0.001)。总之,再次使用罗莫佐单抗是一种有效的治疗方法。此外,其疗效因所使用的序贯治疗而异,按特立帕肽、双膦酸盐和地诺单抗的顺序疗效最高。