Yan Mingxi, Zhu Min, Quan Fei, Chen Panbi, Cui Jin
School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Guizhou University of TCM, Guiyang 550025, China.
School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Chengdu University of TCM.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024 Dec 12;44(12):1370-6. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240517-k0005.
To observe the clinical efficacy of acupoint thread-embedding at fat layer for abdominal obesity and its effects on glucose and lipid metabolism.
Ninety-six patients with abdominal obesity were randomly divided into an acupoint embedding group (48 cases, 3 cases dropped out) and a sham embedding group (48 cases, 3 cases dropped out). Both groups received lifestyle interventions as basic treatment. The acupoint embedding group underwent thread-embedding at Zhongwan (CV 12), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4), and bilateral Liangmen (ST 21), Fenglong (ST 40), and Pishu (BL 20), with the thread implanted in the fat layer. The sham embedding group followed the same acupoint selection and procedure but without catgut implantation. Both groups were treated once every two weeks for 12 weeks, for a total of six treatments. Waist circumference, body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were measured, and appetite was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment and at 12 weeks after treatment completion (follow-up) in the two groups. Visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) at abdomen were measured, and blood glucose and lipid metabolism markers, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), were also tested before and after treatment in the two groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated two weeks after treatment completion.
After treatment and at follow-up, the waist circumference, body weight, BMI, WHR, WHtR, and appetite VAS scores in the acupoint embedding group were decreased compared to those before treatment (<0.01). In the sham embedding group, waist circumference, body weight, BMI, WHtR, and appetite VAS score were also reduced after treatment compared to those before treatment (<0.01). Except for body weight after treatment, the acupoint embedding group showed lower waist circumference, body weight, BMI, WHR, and WHtR values after treatment and at follow-up compared to the sham embedding group (<0.01, <0.05). Additionally, the appetite VAS score in the acupoint embedding group was lower than that in the sham embedding group after treatment (<0.01). Both groups showed a reduction in abdominal VFA and SFA after treatment compared to those before treatment (<0.01, <0.05). In the acupoint embedding group, serum FBG, FINS, HOMA-IR index, TC, TG, LDL-C, leptin, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were decreased compared to those before treatment (<0.01), while HDL-C level was increased (<0.01). In the sham embedding group, serum FBG and HOMA-IR index were decreased compared to those before treatment (<0.01, <0.05). After treatment, the abdominal SFA in the acupoint embedding group was lower than that in the sham embedding group (<0.01). Additionally, the acupoint embedding group had lower levels of serum FINS, HOMA-IR index, TC, LDL-C, leptin, TNF-α, and IL-6 compared to the sham embedding group (<0.05, <0.01). The total effective rate in the acupoint embedding group was 82.2% (37/45), which was significantly higher than 15.6% (7/45) in the sham embedding group (<0.01).
The acupoint catgut embedding at fat layer could effectively reduce the obesity severity in patients with abdominal obesity, decrease abdominal fat accumulation, suppress appetite, improve glucose and lipid metabolism, reduce inflammatory responses, and has a sustained effect.
观察脂肪层穴位埋线治疗腹型肥胖的临床疗效及其对糖脂代谢的影响。
将96例腹型肥胖患者随机分为穴位埋线组(48例,脱落3例)和假埋线组(48例,脱落3例)。两组均接受生活方式干预作为基础治疗。穴位埋线组于中脘(CV 12)、气海(CV 6)、关元(CV 4)及双侧梁门(ST 21)、丰隆(ST 40)、脾俞(BL 20)进行埋线,将线体植入脂肪层。假埋线组选取相同穴位并采用相同操作,但不植入羊肠线。两组均每两周治疗1次,共治疗12周,总计6次。测量两组治疗前、治疗后及治疗结束后12周(随访)时的腰围、体重、体重指数(BMI)、腰臀比(WHR)和腰高比(WHtR),并采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估食欲。测量腹部内脏脂肪面积(VFA)和皮下脂肪面积(SFA),并检测两组治疗前、治疗后的血糖和血脂代谢指标,包括空腹血糖(FBG)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)指数、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、瘦素、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。治疗结束后两周评估临床疗效。
治疗后及随访时,穴位埋线组的腰围、体重、BMI、WHR、WHtR及食欲VAS评分均较治疗前降低(<0.01)。假埋线组治疗后腰围、体重、BMI、WHtR及食欲VAS评分也较治疗前降低(<0.01)。除治疗后体重外,穴位埋线组治疗后及随访时的腰围、体重、BMI、WHR及WHtR值均低于假埋线组(<0.01,<0.05)。此外,穴位埋线组治疗后的食欲VAS评分低于假埋线组(<0.01)。两组治疗后腹部VFA和SFA均较治疗前降低(<0.01,<0.05)。穴位埋线组血清FBG、FINS、HOMA-IR指数、TC、TG、LDL-C、瘦素、TNF-α及IL-6水平较治疗前降低(<0.01),而HDL-C水平升高(<0.01)。假埋线组血清FBG和HOMA-IR指数较治疗前降低(<0.01,<0.05)。治疗后,穴位埋线组腹部SFA低于假埋线组(<0.01)。此外,穴位埋线组血清FINS、HOMA-IR指数、TC、LDL-C、瘦素、TNF-α及IL-6水平低于假埋线组(<0.05,<0.01)。穴位埋线组总有效率为82.2%(37/45),显著高于假埋线组的15.6%(7/45)(<0.01)。
脂肪层穴位埋线可有效减轻腹型肥胖患者的肥胖程度,减少腹部脂肪堆积,抑制食欲,改善糖脂代谢,减轻炎症反应,且具有持续疗效。