Falola Adebayo Feranmi, Adeyeye Ademola, Shekoni Oluwatobi, Oluwagbemi Ayotemi, Effiong-John Blessing, Ogbodu Emmanuella, Dada Oluwasina Samuel, Ndong Abdourahmane
University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.
General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):122-140. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11416-3. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) offer superior outcomes compared to open surgery. This study aimed to review the robotic and laparoscopic procedures for CRC performed in Africa, and compare the mean surgery duration, blood loss, hospital stay, rate of conversion, and prevalence of morbidity and mortality. This is the first study to compare the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for CRC in Africa.
A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, AJOL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched, identifying 2,259 publications, 33 of which were deemed eligible. Statistical analysis of outcomes was performed using "R". Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool.
The minimally invasive approach has been applied for CRC treatment in seven African countries: Algeria, Cameroon, Egypt, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, and South Africa. Laparoscopic surgeries accounted for 1,485 (95%) of cases, while 71 (5%) were robotic. Robotic procedures were associated with a longer surgery duration (256.41 min vs. 190.45 min, p < 0.0001), higher blood loss (226.48 mL vs. 141.55 mL, p < 0.0001), and a shorter hospital stay (4.52 days vs. 6.06 days, p = 0.85). Robotic procedures had a lower rate of conversion (3% vs. 8%, p = 0.29) and a lower prevalence of morbidity (19% vs. 26%, p = 0.26). Wound infection (24.49%) and ileus (57.14%) were the most common complications following laparoscopic and robotic procedures, respectively. There was no mortality from robotic surgeries; however, a prevalence of 0.39% (95% CI: 0;1.19) was recorded from laparoscopy.
This study establishes and compares the outcomes of advances in the treatment of CRC in the African setting, providing insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations to make decisions regarding optimizing care for CRC patients in Africa.
与开放手术相比,结直肠癌(CRC)的微创手术能带来更好的治疗效果。本研究旨在回顾非洲地区开展的结直肠癌机器人手术和腹腔镜手术,并比较平均手术时长、失血量、住院时间、中转率以及发病率和死亡率。这是第一项比较非洲地区结直肠癌机器人手术和腹腔镜手术治疗效果的研究。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索了PubMed、谷歌学术、科学网、AJOL、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,共识别出2259篇文献,其中33篇被认为符合要求。使用“R”软件对结果进行统计分析。采用Cochrane ROBINS-I工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
微创方法已在七个非洲国家用于结直肠癌治疗:阿尔及利亚、喀麦隆、埃及、摩洛哥、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和南非。腹腔镜手术占病例数的1485例(95%),而机器人手术为71例(5%)。机器人手术的手术时间更长(256.41分钟对190.45分钟,p<0.0001),失血量更多(226.48毫升对141.55毫升,p<0.0001),住院时间更短(4.52天对6.06天,p=0.85)。机器人手术的中转率较低(3%对8%,p=0.29),发病率也较低(19%对26%,p=0.26)。腹腔镜手术和机器人手术后最常见的并发症分别是伤口感染(24.49%)和肠梗阻(57.14%)。机器人手术无死亡病例;然而,腹腔镜手术的死亡率为0.39%(95%CI:0;1.19)。
本研究确立并比较了非洲地区结直肠癌治疗进展的效果,为政策制定者、医疗服务提供者和国际组织在优化非洲结直肠癌患者护理方面的决策提供了参考。