• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症委员会对新乳腺癌质量指标下癌症中心表现的回顾:历史数据综述

Commission on Cancer Center Performance with the New Breast Cancer Quality Measures: A Review of Historical Data.

作者信息

Fefferman Marie L, Thompson Danielle M, Wilke Lee G, Hwang Shelley, Bleicher Richard, Freedman Laura M, Meisel Jane L, Kuchta Kristine, Yao Katharine

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.

Department of Surgery, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2045-2055. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x
PMID:39658720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2022, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) has developed three new breast cancer quality measures (QMs): time to surgery (BCSdx) and radiation (BCSRT) and the use of neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2/neu positive breast cancer (BneoCT). This study assesses CoC center historical performance for these measures and facility factors associated with low performance.

METHODS

We examined the median number of days for time to surgery and radiation, and the proportion of facilities that achieved an estimated performance rate (EPR) of 70%, 80%, and 90% from 2004 to 2020 for all three measures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between facility factors and not achieving 80% EPR for all three measures.

RESULTS

The median number of days to surgery and radiation in 2004 were 16 and 43, respectively, compared with 34 and 48 in 2020 (p < 0.01). For BneoCT, BCSdx, and BCSRT measures, the proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR was 68.5%, 72.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. The proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR in 2004 was 92.3% for BCSdx and 49.8% for BCSRT compared with 69.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in 2020. BneoCT performance improved over time. Academic facilities and facilities serving a larger proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were approximately twice as likely to be unable to achieve compliance with all three QMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance levels for BCSRT are the lowest of all three measures. Academic centers and centers with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients are more likely to have lower adherence with all three QMs.

摘要

背景

自2022年以来,癌症委员会(CoC)制定了三项新的乳腺癌质量指标(QMs):手术时间(BCSdx)、放疗时间(BCSRT)以及三阴性和HER2/neu阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗的使用情况(BneoCT)。本研究评估了CoC中心在这些指标上的历史表现以及与低表现相关的机构因素。

方法

我们检查了手术和放疗时间的中位数天数,以及2004年至2020年期间所有三项指标达到估计表现率(EPR)70%、80%和90%的机构比例。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定机构因素与未达到所有三项指标80% EPR之间的关联。

结果

2004年手术和放疗的中位数天数分别为16天和43天,而2020年分别为34天和48天(p < 0.01)。对于BneoCT、BCSdx和BCSRT指标,达到≥80% EPR的机构比例分别为68.5%、72.2%和35.2%。2004年达到≥80% EPR的机构比例,BCSdx为92.3%,BCSRT为49.8%,而2020年分别为69.6%和39.4%。BneoCT的表现随时间有所改善。学术机构以及服务社会经济弱势患者比例较高的机构无法达到所有三项QMs合规的可能性大约是其他机构的两倍。

结论

BCSRT的表现水平在所有三项指标中最低。学术中心和医疗补助患者比例较高的中心更有可能在所有三项QMs上的依从性较低。

相似文献

1
Commission on Cancer Center Performance with the New Breast Cancer Quality Measures: A Review of Historical Data.癌症委员会对新乳腺癌质量指标下癌症中心表现的回顾:历史数据综述
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2045-2055. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Impact of Breast Center Accreditation on Compliance with Breast Quality Performance Measures at Commission on Cancer-Accredited Centers.乳腺中心认证对肿瘤委员会认证中心乳腺质量绩效指标合规性的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1202-1211. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07108-7. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Contemporary Cancer Program Practice Profile Report (CP3R) Compliance Rates for Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.当代癌症计划实践档案报告(CP3R)在乳腺癌方面的合规率:国家癌症数据库分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8589-8599. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10028-8. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Regional Variation in Performance for Commission on Cancer Breast Quality Measures and Impact on Overall Survival.癌症委员会乳房质量测量绩效的区域差异及其对总生存的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):3069-3075. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6592-5. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Treatment delays from transfers of care and their impact on breast cancer quality measures.治疗延误与转移护理及其对乳腺癌质量指标的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;173(3):603-617. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5046-x. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
6
The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer.研究网络中的成员身份与早期乳腺癌治疗指南依从性之间的关系。
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):471-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160416.66188.f5.
7
Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.2003 - 2011年乳房外科手术等待时间:来自国家癌症数据库的报告
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):899-907. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4086-7. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Adherence to the National Quality Forum (NQF) breast cancer measures within cancer clinical trials: a review from ACOSOG Z0010.癌症临床试验中对国家质量论坛(NQF)乳腺癌措施的依从性:来自 ACOSOG Z0010 的回顾。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):1989-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0980-9. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
9
Postmastectomy Radiation in Breast Cancer Patients With Pathologically Positive Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Usage Rates and Survival Trends.新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结病理阳性的乳腺癌患者行术后放疗:使用率和生存趋势。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 1;99(3):549-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2458. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
A community breast center report card determined by participation in the national quality measures for breast centers program.社区乳房中心报告卡由参与国家乳房中心质量措施计划决定。
Breast J. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):472-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00970.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.保乳手术后即刻与延期整形性乳房缩小术对乳腺癌放疗延迟的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8362-8370. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14177-w. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
Disparities in Time to Treatment for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌治疗时间的差异。
Anticancer Res. 2022 Dec;42(12):5813-5818. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16088.
3
A tool to predict disparities in the timeliness of surgical treatment for breast cancer patients in the USA.
用于预测美国乳腺癌患者手术治疗及时性差异的工具。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;191(3):513-522. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06460-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
The Impact of Radiotherapy Delay in Breast Conservation Patients Not Receiving Chemotherapy and the Rationale for Dichotomizing the Radiation Oncology Time-Dependent Standard into Two Quality Measures.保乳患者未接受化疗时放疗延迟的影响,以及将放射肿瘤学时间依赖性标准分为两个质量测量指标的理由。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):469-481. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10512-1. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Assessment of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Common Cancers.评估常见癌症患者队列的治疗开始时间和生存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2030072. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30072.
6
Time to surgery among women treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and upfront surgery for breast cancer.接受新辅助全身治疗和乳腺癌 upfront 手术的女性患者的手术时间。 (注:这里“upfront surgery”可能有更准确专业术语表述,若能结合更多背景信息会翻译得更精准,比如“初始手术”等,这里暂且按字面意思翻译)
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(2):535-550. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06012-7. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Patient-reported treatment delays in breast cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间乳腺癌治疗的患者报告延迟。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):249-254. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05828-7. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
8
Time to Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Affects Survival: Implications for the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Quality Metrics.乳腺癌辅助放疗时间影响生存:对美国外科医师学会肿瘤委员会质量指标的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2614-2625. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08326-8. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
9
Time to initiation of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment does not influence patient survival: A study of US breast cancer patients.开始新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌的时间不影响患者生存率:一项针对美国乳腺癌患者的研究。
Breast J. 2020 Apr;26(4):625-629. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13625. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in U.S. Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014.2012-2014 年国家癌症数据库中捕获的病例与美国基于人群的中央癌症登记处的病例比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1604-1612. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07213-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8.