Treadwell Jonathan R, Wagner Jesse, Reston James T, Phillips Taylor, Hedden-Gross Allison, Tipton Kelley N
ECRI-Penn Evidence-Based Practice Center, 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA, 19462, USA.
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Feb;35(1):5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01081-w. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
For Long COVID autonomic dysfunction, we have summarized published evidence on treatment effectiveness, clinical practice guidelines, and unpublished/ongoing studies.
We first interviewed 11 stakeholders (clinicians, clinician/researchers, payors, patient advocates) to gain clinical insights and identify key areas of focus. We searched Embase, CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases for relevant English-language articles published between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2024. We also searched several other resources for additional relevant guidelines (e.g., UpToDate) and unpublished/ongoing studies (e.g., the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). All information was summarized narratively.
We included 11 effectiveness studies that investigated numerous treatment regimens (fexofenadine + famotidine, maraviroc + pravastatin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nutraceutical formulations, multicomponent treatments, heart rate variability biofeedback, inspiratory muscle training, or stellate ganglion block). One randomized trial reported benefits of a nutraceutical (SIM01) on fatigue and gastrointestinal upset. The 11 guidelines and position statements addressed numerous aspects of treatment, but primarily exercise/rehabilitation, fluid/salt intake, and the use of compression garments. The 15 unpublished/ongoing studies are testing nine different interventions, most prominently ivabradine and intravenous immunoglobulin.
Existing studies on the treatment of Long COVID autonomic dysfunction are often small and uncontrolled, making it unclear whether the observed pre-post changes were due solely to the administered treatments. Guidelines display some overlap, and we identified no direct contradictions. Unpublished/ongoing studies may shed light on this critical area of patient management.
针对新冠后自主神经功能障碍,我们总结了已发表的关于治疗效果、临床实践指南以及未发表/正在进行的研究的证据。
我们首先采访了11位利益相关者(临床医生、临床医生/研究人员、支付方、患者权益倡导者),以获取临床见解并确定关键关注领域。我们在Embase、CINAHL、Medline、PsycINFO和PubMed数据库中搜索了2020年1月1日至2024年4月30日期间发表的相关英文文章。我们还在其他几个资源中搜索了额外的相关指南(如UpToDate)和未发表/正在进行的研究(如国际临床试验注册平台)。所有信息均进行了叙述性总结。
我们纳入了11项疗效研究,这些研究调查了多种治疗方案(非索非那定+法莫替丁、马拉维罗+普伐他汀、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、营养制剂、多成分治疗、心率变异性生物反馈、吸气肌训练或星状神经节阻滞)。一项随机试验报告了一种营养制剂(SIM01)对疲劳和胃肠道不适有益。11份指南和立场声明涉及治疗的多个方面,但主要是运动/康复、液体/盐摄入以及加压服装的使用。15项未发表/正在进行的研究正在测试9种不同的干预措施,最主要的是伊伐布雷定和静脉注射免疫球蛋白。
现有的关于新冠后自主神经功能障碍治疗的研究通常规模较小且缺乏对照,因此不清楚观察到的前后变化是否仅归因于所给予的治疗。指南存在一些重叠,我们未发现直接矛盾之处。未发表/正在进行的研究可能会为这一关键的患者管理领域带来启示。