Gonzales Paul Nichol G, Ampil Encarnita R, Catindig-Dela Rosa Joseree-Ann S, Villaraza Steven G, Joson Ma Lourdes C
Department of Neurology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, PHL.
Department of Neuroscience and Behavioral Medicine, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, PHL.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73353. eCollection 2024 Nov.
There is increasing evidence that establishes a connection between fluctuations in glucose metabolism and the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Current research supports the notion that this metabolic imbalance significantly affects cognitive health. However, the specific mechanisms through which these fluctuations influence neurodegeneration, eventually leading to AD, require further exploration. This study aims to determine the risk of AD among individuals with fluctuations in blood glucose levels, with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), further providing the most recent and thorough overview of the evidence in this area. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a thorough search was carried out utilizing particular phrases in the PubMed, Elsevier, Research Gate, and Cochrane databases: ("glucose variability" or "glycemic variability" or "glucose fluctuation" or "glucose instability" or "glycemic fluctuation") and ("Alzheimer's disease" or "Alzheimer disease" or "Alzheimer dementia" or "Alzheimer"). Studies published between January 2014 to January 2024, written in English, and examining the relationship between glucose variability and AD, were included. The outcomes measured were risk of cognitive impairment and AD, cognitive performance, and risk of AD. The results of the literature search produced 142 records, with six studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Parameters for glycemic variability included fasting plasma glucose (FPG) variability, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) variability, FPG variability independent of the mean (VIM), FPG coefficient of variation (CV), and FPG standard deviation (SD). The studies revealed a positive correlation between glycemic variability and the risk of AD over time, and the findings indicated that maintaining stable glycemic levels may reduce the risk of cognitive decline among individuals with or without T2DM. Due to the small number of studies that are currently available, despite a calculated relative risk of 2.65 indicating a higher risk of AD among subjects with glycemic variability, the inclusion of the null value in the confidence interval (0.61-11.45) renders these findings not statistically significant. This comprehensive review demonstrated that, in people with or without diabetes, glycemic variability influences cognitive decline and the risk of AD. The studies demonstrated a correlation between higher fluctuations in glucose levels and an increased risk of AD, highlighting the importance of managing blood sugar levels to mitigate dementia risks. Despite these strong associations, the actual incidence rates of AD in the studied populations remained relatively low. Overall, the results were not statistically significant. Further research is recommended to explore the risk of AD among individuals with fluctuations in blood glucose levels.
越来越多的证据表明,葡萄糖代谢波动与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病之间存在联系。目前的研究支持这样一种观点,即这种代谢失衡会显著影响认知健康。然而,这些波动影响神经退行性变并最终导致AD的具体机制仍需进一步探索。本研究旨在确定血糖水平波动的个体(无论是否患有2型糖尿病(T2DM))患AD的风险,并进一步提供该领域最新、最全面的证据综述。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南,在PubMed、爱思唯尔、Research Gate和Cochrane数据库中使用特定短语进行了全面检索:(“葡萄糖变异性”或“血糖变异性”或“葡萄糖波动”或“葡萄糖不稳定性”或“血糖波动”)和(“阿尔茨海默病”或“阿尔茨海默氏病”或“阿尔茨海默痴呆症”或“阿尔茨海默”)。纳入2014年1月至2024年1月期间发表的、用英文撰写的、研究葡萄糖变异性与AD之间关系的研究。测量的结果包括认知障碍和AD的风险、认知表现以及AD的风险。文献检索结果产生了142条记录,其中六项研究符合纳入标准。血糖变异性的参数包括空腹血糖(FPG)变异性、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变异性、独立于均值的FPG变异性(VIM)、FPG变异系数(CV)和FPG标准差(SD)。研究表明,随着时间的推移,血糖变异性与AD风险呈正相关,研究结果表明,维持稳定的血糖水平可能会降低患有或未患有T2DM的个体认知能力下降的风险。由于目前可用的研究数量较少,尽管计算出的相对风险为2.65,表明血糖变异性较高的受试者患AD的风险更高,但置信区间(0.61 - 11.45)中包含零值使得这些结果在统计学上不显著。这项全面综述表明,无论是否患有糖尿病,血糖变异性都会影响认知能力下降和AD风险。研究表明,血糖水平波动较大与AD风险增加之间存在关联,突出了控制血糖水平以降低痴呆风险的重要性。尽管存在这些强关联,但研究人群中AD的实际发病率仍然相对较低。总体而言,结果在统计学上不显著。建议进一步研究探索血糖水平波动个体患AD的风险。