• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下腹外斜肌肋间平面阻滞与肋下腹横肌平面阻滞在上腹部手术患者中的镇痛效果比较:一项随机临床研究。

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study.

作者信息

Shrey Shruti, Sinha Chandni, Kumar Abhyuday, Kumar Ajeet, Kumar Amarjeet, Nambiar Sreehari

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;68(11):965-970. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_596_24. Epub 2024 Oct 26.

DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_596_24
PMID:39659529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626888/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Upper abdominal surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block blocks both anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. We compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of unilateral EOI block with conventional unilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

METHODS

Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery via subcostal incision were randomly assigned to receive either EOI block (Group E) or subcostal TAP block (Group T) with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, these patients received intravenous (IV) fentanyl through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump with settings of demand-only mode. The primary outcome was the time to activation of PCA postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (at 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours), patient satisfaction scores (48 hours), and block-related complications. Unpaired -test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients in Group E had an increased mean time of activation of PCA [610.28 [standard deviation (SD): 118.95)] minutes vs 409.68 (SD: 101.36) minutes] ( = 0.001). The 24-hour postoperative mean fentanyl consumption was 102.40 (SD: 25.70) μg in Group E versus 123.20 (SD: 34.38) μg in Group T ( = 0.019). Patients in Group E had better satisfaction scores ( < 0.001). Pain scores were better at 30 minutes and 6 hours.

CONCLUSION

EOI block provides effective postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgeries as it prolongs the duration of PCA activation with a better patient satisfaction score.

摘要

背景与目的

上腹部手术会引发严重的术后疼痛。腹外斜肌肋间肌(EOI)阻滞可同时阻断肋间神经的前皮支和外侧皮支。我们比较了单侧EOI阻滞与传统单侧肋下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的术后镇痛效果。

方法

50例计划通过肋下切口进行上腹部手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I/II级患者,随机分为两组,分别接受25毫升0.2%罗哌卡因的EOI阻滞(E组)或肋下TAP阻滞(T组)。术后,这些患者通过仅按需模式的患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵接受静脉注射(IV)芬太尼。主要结局指标是术后PCA启动时间。次要结局指标包括24小时阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分(术后30分钟以及1、2、4、6、12和24小时)、患者满意度评分(48小时)以及与阻滞相关的并发症。采用不成对t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

E组患者PCA启动的平均时间增加[610.28(标准差(SD):118.95)分钟 vs 409.68(SD:101.36)分钟](P = 0.001)。E组术后24小时芬太尼平均消耗量为102.40(SD:25.70)μg,T组为123.20(SD:34.38)μg(P = 0.019)。E组患者的满意度评分更高(P < 0.001)。在术后30分钟和6小时时疼痛评分更佳。

结论

EOI阻滞在上腹部手术中提供了有效的术后镇痛,因为它延长了PCA启动的持续时间,患者满意度评分更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/d16ea86d07b1/IJA-68-965-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/2206184069c0/IJA-68-965-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/6e4f12ec5c65/IJA-68-965-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/28eef2793220/IJA-68-965-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/d16ea86d07b1/IJA-68-965-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/2206184069c0/IJA-68-965-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/6e4f12ec5c65/IJA-68-965-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/28eef2793220/IJA-68-965-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7577/11626888/d16ea86d07b1/IJA-68-965-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study.超声引导下腹外斜肌肋间平面阻滞与肋下腹横肌平面阻滞在上腹部手术患者中的镇痛效果比较:一项随机临床研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;68(11):965-970. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_596_24. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
Perioperative analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal block and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients receiving laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.超声引导下肋间外肌阻滞与肋下斜行腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜根治性胃癌切除术患者中的围手术期镇痛效果及安全性
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):7126-7135. doi: 10.62347/TAWR9849. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block on the postoperative analgesia after open liver surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.超声引导下外侧肋间平面阻滞对开腹肝手术后镇痛效果的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 16;25(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08449-3.
4
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial.超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与肋缘下斜腹横肌平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术成年患者术后镇痛的随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛和静脉阿片类药物镇痛的镇痛效果比较。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):507-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318297fcee. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
Effect of Subcostal Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy.腹腔镜根治性胃切除术后肋缘下前锯肌肌间沟阻滞与肋缘下横腹肌腱膜平面阻滞的效果比较。
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Oct;41(5):974-980. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2429-8. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
The impact of external oblique intercostal block on early postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing J-shaped incisions for upper abdominal surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled study.腹外斜肌肋间阻滞对接受上腹部手术J形切口患者术后早期疼痛及恢复的影响:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03030-0.
8
Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.术前双侧肋间外斜肌加腹直肌鞘阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛管理:一项非劣效性双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):601-606. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235.
9
Comparison of efficacy and safety of lateral-to-medial continuous transversus abdominis plane block with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A randomised, open-label feasibility study.腹横肌平面阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛用于腹部手术患者的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机、开放标签的可行性研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):797-804. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000345.
10
The analgesic contribution of external oblique intercostal block: Case reports of 3 different surgeries and 3 spectacular effects.外侧肋间肌阻滞的镇痛作用:3 种不同手术和 3 种显著效果的病例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030435.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypothesis reporting in randomised controlled trials: A critical appraisal of IJA 2024 publications.随机对照试验中的假设报告:对《国际应用科学杂志》2024年出版物的批判性评价
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;69(6):621-624. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_164_25. Epub 2025 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Port-Site Infiltration for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.腹外斜肌肋间平面阻滞与切口局部浸润在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1826-1833. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07219-z. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Patient and Observer-Blinded Study.超声引导下外侧肋间平面阻滞用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后镇痛:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、患者和观察者盲法研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1505-1512. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07174-9. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3
External Oblique Intercostal Block for Living Kidney Donor Open Nephrectomy: A Case Series.
活体肾供体开放肾切除术的腹外斜肌肋间阻滞:病例系列
Cureus. 2023 May 17;15(5):e39139. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39139. eCollection 2023 May.
4
External oblique intercostal (EOI) block for enhanced recovery after liver surgery: a case series.肝手术后采用腹外斜肌肋间肌(EOI)阻滞促进恢复:病例系列
Anaesth Rep. 2023 Apr 27;11(1):e12225. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12225. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
5
The analgesic contribution of external oblique intercostal block: Case reports of 3 different surgeries and 3 spectacular effects.外侧肋间肌阻滞的镇痛作用:3 种不同手术和 3 种显著效果的病例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030435.
6
Patients with gastroenteric tumor after upper abdominal surgery were more likely to require rescue analgesia than lower abdominal surgery.上腹部手术后的胃肠肿瘤患者比下腹部手术后更有可能需要解救性镇痛。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 23;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01682-w.
7
External oblique intercostal plane block for upper abdominal surgery: use in obese patients.用于上腹部手术的腹外斜肌肋间平面阻滞:在肥胖患者中的应用
Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):e295-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
The External Oblique Intercostal Block: Anatomic Evaluation and Case Series.外侧肋间神经阻滞:解剖评估和病例系列。
Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2436-2442. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab296.
9
Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Acute Pain Management: A Review.肋下横腹直肌平面阻滞用于急性疼痛管理的综述
Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Oct 20;7(5):e12923. doi: 10.5812/aapm.12923. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.椎管内阻滞的主要并发症:英国皇家麻醉师学院第三次全国审计项目报告
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;102(2):179-90. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen360. Epub 2009 Jan 12.