• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer Review as a Professional Obligation: Steps and Tips to Becoming a High-Quality Reviewer.同行评审作为一项职业义务：成为高质量评审员的步骤与技巧
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;29(6):570-577. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.570. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.为改进基金和期刊同行评审而进行的审稿人培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2.
3
A primer: peer review process for .一个入门指南：同行评审过程。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Dec 1;48(4):932-935. doi: 10.1152/advan.00127.2024. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.稿件评审人在同行评审过程中的作用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Sep;165(3):685-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645496.
5
Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy.撰写投稿至同行评审的科学期刊的稿件：欧洲临床药学学会的指导建议。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):548-554. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01695-6. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review.确定科学同行评审中的性别差距。
Elife. 2023 Nov 3;12:RP90230. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90230.
7
Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals.同行评议中的挑战：如何保证科学期刊编辑过程的质量和透明度。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Jul;99(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
9
Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.编辑关于通过同行评审和审稿人培养提高稿件质量及编辑决策的观点
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):73. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81473.
10
[The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].[同行评审员活动的认可：对良性循环的潜在促进。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Sep;108(9):355-359. doi: 10.1701/2745.27985.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer review for medical journals: why and how?医学期刊的同行评议：为何及如何进行？
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 30;37:e20250098. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250098. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Training the next generation of peer reviewers: Steps for guiding pharmacy learners through the peer review process.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Feb 20;81(5):e137-e140. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad277.
2
Peer Review in a General Medical Research Journal Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后全科医学研究期刊的同行评审
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53296.
3
Peer Review at JGIM.《普通内科医学杂志》的同行评审
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3657-3658. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07250-1.
4
"What if We All Said No?": Removing Barriers to Peer Review.“要是我们都拒绝呢？”：消除同行评审的障碍
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Apr;86(4):8746. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8746. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Editorial. Putting pen to paper during a pandemic: increased manuscript submissions to the JNS Publishing Group.社论。疫情期间提笔著文：向《神经外科杂志》出版集团提交的稿件增多
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jul 24;133(4):947-949. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.JNS202691. Print 2020 Oct 1.
6
Editorial Evaluation and Peer Review During a Pandemic: How Journals Maintain Standards.大流行期间的编辑评估与同行评审：期刊如何维持标准
JAMA. 2020 Aug 4;324(5):453-454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11764.
7
Responding to Manuscript Reviewer and Editor Comments.回复稿件评审人和编辑的意见。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Sep;53(9):959-961. doi: 10.1177/1060028019849941. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Improving peer review: What reviewers can do.改进同行评审：评审人员可以做些什么。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Dec 15;74(24):2080-2084. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170190. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.编辑关于通过同行评审和审稿人培养提高稿件质量及编辑决策的观点
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):73. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81473.
10
Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.同行评审作为专业职责：质量控制系统的优劣取决于参与者。
Biomaterials. 2007 Dec;28(34):5199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

同行评审作为一项职业义务：成为高质量评审员的步骤与技巧

Peer Review as a Professional Obligation: Steps and Tips to Becoming a High-Quality Reviewer.

作者信息

Johnson Peter N, Miller Jamie L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences (PNJ, JLM), College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;29(6):570-577. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.570. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.570
PMID:39659860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627579/
Abstract

Peer review is an essential step in the publication process and dissemination for scientific information to improve patient care and future research in pediatric patients. It is a professional obligation to ensure high quality, reliable, and relevant information is published. Despite this, many journals face problems finding peer reviewers. Several journals and organizations have developed resources to aid in the training of peer reviewers. The purpose of this primer is to provide an overview of the steps of peer review and to emphasize key points on how to conduct a peer review.

摘要

同行评审是科学信息出版过程和传播中的一个重要步骤，对于改善儿科患者的医疗护理及未来研究而言至关重要。确保高质量、可靠且相关的信息得以发表是一项专业职责。尽管如此，许多期刊在寻找同行评审人员方面面临问题。一些期刊和组织已经开发了有助于培训同行评审人员的资源。本入门指南的目的是概述同行评审的步骤，并强调关于如何进行同行评审的关键点。