• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在感知决策中,信心或元认知能力不存在性别差异。

No gender difference in confidence or metacognitive ability in perceptual decision-making.

作者信息

Xue Kai, Zheng Yunxuan, Papalexandrou Christina, Hoogervorst Kelly, Allen Micah, Rahnev Dobromir

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

School of Behavioral and Social Sciences, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

iScience. 2024 Nov 12;27(12):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111375. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111375
PMID:39660052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629282/
Abstract

Prior research has found inconsistent results regarding gender differences in confidence and metacognitive ability. Different studies have shown that men are either more or less confident and have either higher or lower metacognitive abilities than women. However, this research has generally not used well-controlled tasks or used performance-independent measures of metacognitive ability. Here, we test for gender differences in performance, confidence, and metacognitive ability using data from 10 studies from the Confidence Database (total  = 1,887, total number of trials = 633,168). We find an absence of strong gender differences in performance and no gender differences in either confidence or metacognitive ability. These results were further confirmed by meta-analyses of the 10 datasets. These findings show that it is unlikely that gender has a strong effect on metacognitive evaluation in low-level perceptual decision-making and suggest that previously observed gender differences in confidence and metacognition are likely domain-specific.

摘要

先前的研究在自信和元认知能力的性别差异方面得出了不一致的结果。不同的研究表明,男性在自信程度上要么比女性更高,要么比女性更低,在元认知能力方面也是要么比女性更高,要么比女性更低。然而,这项研究通常没有使用控制良好的任务,也没有使用与表现无关的元认知能力测量方法。在这里,我们使用来自信心数据库的10项研究的数据(总计1887人,试验总数为633168次)来测试表现、自信和元认知能力方面的性别差异。我们发现,在表现方面不存在明显的性别差异,在自信或元认知能力方面也不存在性别差异。对这10个数据集的荟萃分析进一步证实了这些结果。这些发现表明,在低水平感知决策中,性别不太可能对元认知评估产生强烈影响,并表明先前观察到的自信和元认知方面的性别差异可能是特定领域的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/f37d8b387171/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/7f284a8b5f81/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/0fc1c1a8f2a4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/65a9275b0908/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/f37d8b387171/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/7f284a8b5f81/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/0fc1c1a8f2a4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/65a9275b0908/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96d/11629282/f37d8b387171/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
No gender difference in confidence or metacognitive ability in perceptual decision-making.在感知决策中,信心或元认知能力不存在性别差异。
iScience. 2024 Nov 12;27(12):111375. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111375. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
7
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.针对临床医生的干预措施对基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方行为的影响:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD012252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012252.pub2.
10
Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.羟考酮治疗癌性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):CD003870. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003870.pub7.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural correlates of metacognition: Disentangling the brain circuits underlying prospective and retrospective second-order judgments through noninvasive brain stimulation.元认知的神经关联:通过非侵入性脑刺激解开预测性和回溯性二阶判断的大脑回路。
J Neurosci Res. 2024 Apr;102(4):e25330. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25330.
2
The timing of confidence computations in human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层中置信度计算的时机。
Cortex. 2023 Nov;168:167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
On why we lack confidence in some signal-detection-based analyses of confidence.
关于为何我们对一些基于信号检测的信心分析缺乏信心。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Aug;113:103532. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103532. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Internal noise measures in coarse and fine motion direction discrimination tasks and the correlation with autism traits.在粗动和微动方向辨别任务中的内部噪声测量及其与自闭症特征的相关性。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):19. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.19.
5
Dynamic influences on static measures of metacognition.动态对元认知静态测量的影响。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 21;13(1):4208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31727-0.
6
The Impact of Feedback on Perceptual Decision-Making and Metacognition: Reduction in Bias but No Change in Sensitivity.反馈对感知决策和元认知的影响:减少偏差但不改变敏感性。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Feb;33(2):259-275. doi: 10.1177/09567976211032887. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Examining the robustness of the relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias.考察元认知效率与元认知偏差之间关系的稳健性。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103196. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Gender Differences in the Interest in Mathematics Schoolwork Across 50 Countries.50个国家学生对数学功课兴趣的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:578092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578092. eCollection 2020.
9
Visual awareness judgments are sensitive to accuracy feedback in stimulus discrimination tasks.视觉意识判断对刺激辨别任务中的准确性反馈敏感。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Nov;86:103035. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103035. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.决策信心在采纳建议和建立信任方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):507-526. doi: 10.1037/xge0000960. Epub 2020 Oct 1.