de Mortier Chloé A, Yaros Jen, van Mastrigt Ghislaine A P G, Verstegen Daniëlle M L, Evers Silvia M A A, Majoie Marian H J M, Dreesens Dunja H H, Paulus Aggie T G
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14264. doi: 10.1111/jep.14264.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The incorporation of economic considerations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) could help promote cost-conscious decision-making in healthcare. Though healthcare expenditures increase, and resources are becoming scarcer, the extent to which economic considerations are incorporated into CPGs remains limited. This scoping review aims to identify the challenges and potential stimulating factors to incorporate economic considerations in CPGs.
This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology and findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in eight databases considering literature published from July 2017 and onwards. Data extraction was conducted via an iterative and inductive approach to identify challenges and potential stimulating factors from the included reports. Included documents focused on the (para)medical field and reported on CPG development and economic considerations.
The search identified 2445 documents from which 33 documents were included for analysis. The analysis identified five challenges: discourse surrounding economic considerations in CPGs, methodological ambiguities, scarcity of (high-quality) economic evidence, transferability of evidence, and resource constraints. Additionally, three potential stimulating factors were identified: acceptance, economic evidence knowledge, and guidance on incorporating economic considerations.
These findings reflect the complexity of incorporating economic considerations in CPGs. The identified challenges highlight the need for clearer guidance (i.e. by training) and standardised methodologies for incorporating economic considerations in CPGs. The potential stimulating factors provide a roadmap for future efforts to enhance the integration of economic evidence in CPGs. Collaborative initiatives between health economists, CPG developers, and other stakeholders are essential to drive progress in this area and promote cost-conscious decision-making in healthcare.
理由、目的和目标:将经济因素纳入临床实践指南(CPG)有助于在医疗保健中推动注重成本的决策制定。尽管医疗保健支出不断增加,资源日益稀缺,但经济因素纳入CPG的程度仍然有限。本范围综述旨在确定将经济因素纳入CPG的挑战和潜在促进因素。
本范围综述按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所方法进行,并根据系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南报告结果。在八个数据库中进行了系统检索,考虑了2017年7月及以后发表的文献。通过迭代和归纳方法进行数据提取,以从纳入的报告中识别挑战和潜在促进因素。纳入的文件侧重于(准)医学领域,并报告了CPG制定和经济因素。
检索到2445份文件,其中33份文件纳入分析。分析确定了五个挑战:CPG中围绕经济因素的讨论、方法上的模糊性、(高质量)经济证据的稀缺性、证据的可转移性以及资源限制。此外,还确定了三个潜在促进因素:接受度、经济证据知识以及纳入经济因素的指导。
这些发现反映了将经济因素纳入CPG的复杂性。所确定的挑战凸显了对更清晰指导(即通过培训)以及将经济因素纳入CPG的标准化方法的需求。潜在促进因素为未来加强经济证据在CPG中的整合提供了路线图。卫生经济学家、CPG开发者和其他利益相关者之间的合作举措对于推动该领域的进展以及促进医疗保健中注重成本的决策制定至关重要。