• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨传导设备采用策略:非使用挑战、深入见解及患者满意度研究

A Strategy for Bone Conduction Device Adoption: Study of Non-Usage Challenges, Skin-Deep Insights and Patient Satisfaction.

作者信息

Van de Kerkhof Jasmine, Bleyaert Lore, Verhaert Nicolas, Lerut Bob

机构信息

Department of ENT, H&N Surgery, General Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium

Department of Audiology, General Hospital Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium

出版信息

J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Nov 25;20(6):523-530. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.241585.

DOI:10.5152/iao.2024.241585
PMID:39660727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11639600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and usage patterns of bone conduction devices (BCDs) for hearing rehabilitation, focusing on both users and non-users. Specific objectives included assessing reasons for non-use, exploring patient perceptions of BCD efficacy, and examining complications associated with BCD implantation.

METHODS

A monocentric investigation was conducted at the Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat Diseases, Head and Neck Surgery at General Hospital Sint-Jan, Bruges. Patients who underwent BCD implantation between 2009 and 2020 were included. A questionnaire based on the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) was administered to assess patient satisfaction. Additional questions were added to explore reasons for non-use and interest in alternative devices. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Among 76 respondents, the majority expressed high satisfaction with their BCDs, reporting significant improvements in daily life and quality of hearing. The non-user rate was 8.9%, primarily attributed to perceived lack of benefit or skin problems. Complications requiring explantation were rare (3.4%). Single-sided deafness (SSD) and non-SSD patients exhibited similar satisfaction levels, but SSD patients reported higher non-use due to insufficient hearing benefits. Patients expressed interest (29.6%) in more advanced BCDs.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the overall positive impact of BCDs on patient satisfaction and quality of life. Personalized care, informed decision-making, and rigorous preoperative evaluation are crucial in achieving favorable outcomes. Technological advancements offer promising opportunities for further enhancing BCD efficacy, underscoring the importance of ongoing research and innovation in hearing rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估用于听力康复的骨传导装置(BCD)的患者满意度和使用模式,重点关注使用者和非使用者。具体目标包括评估不使用的原因、探究患者对BCD疗效的看法以及检查与BCD植入相关的并发症。

方法

在布鲁日圣扬总医院耳鼻喉疾病与头颈外科进行了一项单中心调查。纳入了2009年至2020年间接受BCD植入的患者。采用基于国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)的问卷来评估患者满意度。还增加了其他问题以探究不使用的原因和对替代装置的兴趣。数据分析包括描述性统计和卡方检验,以比较组间结果。

结果

在76名受访者中,大多数人对其BCD表示高度满意,称日常生活和听力质量有显著改善。不使用率为8.9%,主要归因于认为没有益处或皮肤问题。需要取出装置的并发症很少见(3.4%)。单侧耳聋(SSD)患者和非SSD患者的满意度水平相似,但SSD患者因听力益处不足而报告的不使用率更高。患者对更先进的BCD表现出兴趣(29.6%)。

结论

本研究强调了BCD对患者满意度和生活质量的总体积极影响。个性化护理、明智的决策和严格的术前评估对于取得良好结果至关重要。技术进步为进一步提高BCD疗效提供了有希望的机会,突出了听力康复领域持续研究和创新的重要性。

相似文献

1
A Strategy for Bone Conduction Device Adoption: Study of Non-Usage Challenges, Skin-Deep Insights and Patient Satisfaction.骨传导设备采用策略:非使用挑战、深入见解及患者满意度研究
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Nov 25;20(6):523-530. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.241585.
2
Efficient Bone Conduction Hearing Device With a Novel Piezoelectric Transducer Using Skin as an Electrode.采用皮肤作为电极的新型压电换能器的高效骨传导听力装置。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Nov;69(11):3326-3333. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3168229. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.主动经皮骨导听力植入物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0221484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221484. eCollection 2019.
4
Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.骨锚式助听器:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2002;2(3):1-47. Epub 2002 Sep 1.
5
Auditory Performance and Subjective Satisfaction with the ADHEAR System.ADHEAR系统的听觉表现及主观满意度
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(1):1-10. doi: 10.1159/000507775. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of bone conduction hearing implants in rehabilitation of hearing loss.评估骨传导听力植入物在听力损失康复中的效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):3987-3996. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07889-y. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Comparison of Satisfaction Between Patients Using Percutaneous and Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.经皮与经皮骨导式助听设备使用满意度比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jun;40(5):651-657. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002203.
8
eHealth usage among parents to premature or surgically treated neonates: associations with eHealth literacy, healthcare satisfaction or satisfaction with an eHealth device.家长对早产儿或接受手术治疗的新生儿使用电子健康的情况:与电子健康素养、医疗保健满意度或对电子健康设备的满意度的关联。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Oct 21;23(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04340-3.
9
Active Bone Conduction Implant and Adhesive Bone Conduction Device: A Comparison of Audiological Performance and Subjective Satisfaction.有源骨传导植入物和粘性骨传导装置:听力性能与主观满意度比较
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar 11;28(2):e332-e338. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777416. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Longitudinal study of use of the pressure free, adhesive bone conducting hearing system in children at a tertiary centre.在一家三级中心对儿童使用无压、粘性骨导听力系统的纵向研究。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110307. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110307. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single-Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study: International consensus on outcome measures for trials of interventions for adults with single-sided deafness.单侧聋核心康复结局集(CROSSSD)研究:成人单侧聋干预试验结局测量的国际共识。
Trials. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06702-1.
2
Prospective 5 year outcomes of different implant designs and surgical techniques in 68 patients with bone anchored hearing implants.68例骨锚式听力植入患者中不同植入物设计和手术技术的5年前瞻性结果。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan;48(1):65-69. doi: 10.1111/coa.13974. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Early Osia® 2 bone conduction hearing implant experience: Nationwide controlled-market release data and single-center outcomes.
早期 Osia® 2 骨导式听力植入物的经验:全国性控制市场发布数据和单中心结果。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102818. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102818. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Patients' Experiences of Deciding Whether or Not to Accept Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Qualitative Investigation.患者决定是否接受骨导式听力植入物的体验:一项定性研究。
Ear Hear. 2021 Mar/Apr;42(2):456-464. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000952.
5
Adoption, use and non-use of hearing aids: a robust estimate based on Welsh national survey statistics.助听器的使用、不使用与验配:基于威尔士全国调查统计数据的稳健估计。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Aug;59(8):567-573. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1773550. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
First United Kingdom experience of the novel Osia active transcutaneous piezoelectric bone conduction implant.新型 Osia 主动经皮压电骨传导植入物在英国的首次应用经验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;277(11):2995-3002. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06022-7. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Clinical performance of the Osia™ system, a new active osseointegrated implant system. Results from a prospective clinical investigation.新型主动式骨结合种植系统Osia™的临床性能:一项前瞻性临床研究结果
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Mar;140(3):212-219. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1691744. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
8
The IPS-scale: A new soft tissue assessment scale for percutaneous and transcutaneous implants for bone conduction devices.IPS量表:一种用于骨传导装置经皮和经皮植入物的新型软组织评估量表。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Dec;42(6):1410-1413. doi: 10.1111/coa.12922. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Towards a Unified Testing Framework for Single-Sided Deafness Studies: A Consensus Paper.迈向单侧耳聋研究的统一测试框架:一份共识文件。
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(6):391-398. doi: 10.1159/000455058. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Acoustic hearing implants for mixed hearing loss: a systematic review.混合性听力损失的声学听力植入物:系统评价。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1201-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce7d2.