Brinken Lillian, Shiells Kate, Ferguson Stuart G, Franja Stefania, Blackwell Anna, Braboszcz Claire, Maynard Olivia M
Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1051-1058. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae297.
Tobacco warning labels typically feature confronting health-risk messages that aim to evoke fear to change behavior. Evidence shows these graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) can be effective but can also lead to unintended responses, including avoidance or defensiveness. Theory suggests that targeting beliefs about the likelihood and benefits of successfully quitting may increase adaptive responses to risk information.
Participants with nil imminent quitting intentions were recruited to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the United Kingdom investigating the effects of receiving daily textual SMS messages targeting risk, self-efficacy, and response-efficacy beliefs on cessation behavior. To explore their experiences receiving SMS messages during the RCT as well as their naturalistic exposure to GHWLs, we undertook a qualitative investigation conducting semi-structured interviews with 20 participants. Four main themes were generated via thematic analysis.
Participants found efficacy messaging motivating, reporting increased hope for cessation. Further, these messages bolstered knowledge about cessation benefits and treatment options, which may increase treatment-related health literacy. Self-efficacy and response-efficacy messages were well-received and seen to complement each other whereas naturalistic exposure to GHWLs was associated with defensive responses and the use of strategies to manage negative affect. GHWLs were seen to contribute to the stigmatization of people who smoke (PWS) as part of a broader denormalization of smoking.
GHWLs in their current form can have unintended consequences for PWS and can lead to defensive responses. By contrast, messages that address efficacy beliefs can increase hope, knowledge of cessation supports, and motivation, thus supporting adaptive responses to smoking health risks.
Continued use of confronting graphic health warning labels in their current form should be reconsidered. Future policy and research should investigate how efficacy content can be effectively integrated into tobacco packaging to optimize the impact of this space in targeting determinants of cessation. Efficacy content can give people who smoke hope for the future and valuable information about pathways to cessation. These benefits may have applications in other streams of health promotion such as primary care, m-health initiatives, or public service announcements.
烟草警告标签通常呈现直面健康风险的信息,旨在引发恐惧以改变行为。有证据表明,这些图形健康警告标签(GHWLs)可能有效,但也可能导致意外反应,包括回避或抵触情绪。理论表明,针对成功戒烟可能性和益处的信念进行干预,可能会增加对风险信息的适应性反应。
在英国招募了近期无戒烟意愿的参与者,进行一项随机对照试验(RCT),研究每日接收针对风险、自我效能感和反应效能感信念的短信对戒烟行为的影响。为了探究他们在随机对照试验期间接收短信的体验以及他们对图形健康警告标签的自然接触情况,我们对20名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,开展了一项定性调查。通过主题分析得出了四个主要主题。
参与者发现效能信息具有激励作用,并表示对戒烟的希望有所增加。此外,这些信息增强了他们对戒烟益处和治疗选择的了解,这可能会提高与治疗相关的健康素养。自我效能感和反应效能感信息受到好评,且被视为相辅相成,而对图形健康警告标签的自然接触则与抵触反应以及管理负面情绪的策略的使用有关。图形健康警告标签被视为导致吸烟者被污名化的一个因素,这是吸烟全面去常态化的一部分。
当前形式的图形健康警告标签可能会给吸烟者带来意外后果,并导致抵触反应。相比之下,针对效能信念的信息可以增加希望、对戒烟支持的了解以及动力,从而支持对吸烟健康风险的适应性反应。
应重新考虑继续使用当前形式的直面图形健康警告标签。未来的政策和研究应调查如何将效能内容有效整合到烟草包装中,以优化这一空间在针对戒烟决定因素方面的影响。效能内容可以给吸烟者带来对未来的希望以及关于戒烟途径的宝贵信息。这些益处可能适用于其他健康促进领域,如初级保健、移动健康倡议或公共服务公告。