Song Yuxuan, Du Yiqing, Jiang Shan, Peng Yun, Luo Xing, Xu Tao
Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Pharmacol Res. 2025 Jan;211:107543. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107543. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration is one of the common driver alterations in urothelial carcinoma (UC). FGFR alterations contribute to anti-tumor immunity inhibition and are associated with attenuated response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or chemotherapy. Selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (FGFRi) has been approved for FGFR-altered UC. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of FGFRi with ICI or chemotherapy remains under debate. We analyzed 865 UC patients including 447 with FGFRi and 418 with ICI or chemotherapy. FGFRi showed better recurrence-free survival for non-muscle invasive UC and higher objective response for advanced UC than ICI or chemotherapy. However, FGFRi demonstrated no benefit for the survival of advanced UC and led to more treatment-related adverse events, especially adverse events causing dose interruptions. It is worth noting that patients with liver metastasis might benefit from FGFRi in terms of both prognosis and response. In summary, FGFRi offered higher efficacy and lower safety in second-line treatment of FGFR-altered UC. It is crucial for clinicians to balance the efficacy and safety in different tumor stages when considering the use of FGFRi for UC treatment.
成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR)改变是尿路上皮癌(UC)常见的驱动改变之一。FGFR改变有助于抑制抗肿瘤免疫,并与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)或化疗反应减弱相关。选择性泛FGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(FGFRi)已被批准用于FGFR改变的UC。然而,FGFRi与ICI或化疗相比的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。我们分析了865例UC患者,其中447例接受FGFRi治疗,418例接受ICI或化疗。与ICI或化疗相比,FGFRi在非肌肉浸润性UC中显示出更好的无复发生存率,在晚期UC中显示出更高的客观缓解率。然而,FGFRi对晚期UC的生存没有益处,并且导致更多与治疗相关的不良事件,尤其是导致剂量中断的不良事件。值得注意的是,肝转移患者在预后和反应方面可能从FGFRi中获益。总之,FGFRi在FGFR改变的UC二线治疗中疗效更高但安全性更低。临床医生在考虑使用FGFRi治疗UC时,在不同肿瘤阶段平衡疗效和安全性至关重要。