Somberg J, Butler B, Flowers D, Keefe D, Torres V, Miura D
Am Heart J. 1985 Jan;109(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90412-0.
One hundred patients inducible at electrophysiologic studies underwent serial drug testing with procainamide, lidocaine, and lorcainide to determine comparative efficacy. Acute intravenous administration was followed by repeat programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies on separate days for each antiarrhythmic drug. Lorcainide prevented ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction in 69% of the 100 patients studied, procainamide was effective in 50% of the 75 patients studied, and lidocaine prevented VT induction in 30% of 53 patients. Following PES and serial drug testing, 46 patients were started on lorcainide, nine patients on procainamide, and 45 patients were started on other antiarrhythmic drug regimens. Seventy percent of the patients have remained on lorcainide therapy, while 47% have continued on other drug therapies started over a 20.5 +/- 3.2-month mean follow-up period. Despite sleep-wake disturbances and a need for sedation at night, lorcainide therapy was tolerated well in this population and remained an effective antiarrhythmic with prolonged administration.
100例在电生理研究中可诱发心律失常的患者接受了普鲁卡因酰胺、利多卡因和劳卡尼的系列药物测试,以确定其相对疗效。每种抗心律失常药物在急性静脉给药后,于不同日期重复进行程序电刺激(PES)研究。在100例接受研究的患者中,劳卡尼使69%的患者不再诱发室性心动过速(VT);在75例接受研究的患者中,普鲁卡因酰胺使50%的患者有效;在53例患者中,利多卡因使30%的患者不再诱发VT。经过PES和系列药物测试后,46例患者开始使用劳卡尼,9例患者开始使用普鲁卡因酰胺,45例患者开始使用其他抗心律失常药物治疗方案。70%的患者继续接受劳卡尼治疗,而在平均20.5±3.2个月的随访期内,47%的患者继续使用开始时的其他药物治疗。尽管存在睡眠-觉醒障碍且夜间需要镇静,但该人群对劳卡尼治疗的耐受性良好,长期给药时它仍是一种有效的抗心律失常药物。