Cappella Joseph N, Gaysynsky Anna, Chou Wen-Ying Sylvia, Heley Kathryn, Vanderpool Robin C
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute.
Health Commun. 2024 Dec 12:1-12. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2437594.
One approach to addressing observed health disparities that is frequently discussed in the literature is adapting health messages to the cultural identities of groups who experience an undue burden of disease. The extant research on the cultural tailoring and targeting (CTT) of health messages generally indicates that such adaptations are effective. However, the empirical basis for this conclusion does not provide definitive evidence that CTT is always necessary nor demonstrate that culturally adapted messages are always more effective than more general message appeals. Despite extensive literature on CTT, important questions remain about the necessary components, methodology, and evaluation of CTT research. In this essay, we present a set of criteria for assessing the existing research base for CTT and ensuring that future CTT research is valid, replicable, rigorous, and robust. Key considerations include identifying when CTT is necessary, conducting rigorous formative research, using appropriate experimental designs, designing message interventions in a way that enables generalization, and evaluating mediators in order to build explanatory theories of CTT.
文献中经常讨论的一种解决已观察到的健康差异的方法是,使健康信息适应那些承受过重疾病负担群体的文化身份。关于健康信息的文化定制与定位(CTT)的现有研究总体表明,这种调整是有效的。然而,这一结论的实证依据并未提供确凿证据证明CTT总是必要的,也未表明文化适应性信息总是比更一般的信息诉求更有效。尽管有大量关于CTT的文献,但关于CTT研究的必要组成部分、方法和评估仍存在重要问题。在本文中,我们提出了一套标准,用于评估CTT的现有研究基础,并确保未来的CTT研究是有效、可复制、严谨且有力的。关键考虑因素包括确定CTT何时必要、进行严谨的形成性研究、使用适当的实验设计、以能够推广的方式设计信息干预措施,以及评估中介变量以构建CTT的解释性理论。