• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘性髋关节发育不良合并股骨髋臼撞击综合征的决策:运用离散选择实验探索患者偏好

Decision-making in borderline hip dysplasia and concomitant femoracetabular impingement syndrome: using a discrete choice experiment to explore patient preferences.

作者信息

Cabell Grant H, Kwon Nicholas F, Shultz Christopher, Hutyra Carolyn A, Lewis Brian D, Olson Steven A, Salata Michael J, Nho Shane J, Mather Iii Richard C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 3475 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.

出版信息

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Feb 1;11(3):167-175. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae002. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnae002
PMID:39664210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631526/
Abstract

Decision-making regarding surgical treatment of patients showing radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) remains a challenge as there is no consensus on treatment in current literature. When medical evidence is unclear, understanding patient preferences becomes particularly important in deciding the optimal treatment for each patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the patient-determined importance of factors surrounding surgical treatment of FAIS in BHD. Patients aged 18-65 with hip pain and BHD (defined as lateral center edge angle 18-25 or Tonnis angle 10-15) morphology were given a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) focusing on attributes that differ between treatment options: Length of Hospital Stay, Major Complication Rate, Chance of Needing Reoperation within 2 Years and Time to Return to Regular Exercise. This DCE was used to calculate treatment preferences, relative attribute importance and preference weights. A total of 101 patients fully completed the DCE. The most important attribute (average importance weight, 95% CI) was Chance of Reoperation (60.16, 56.99-63.34), while the least important was Hospital Stay (6.57, 5.73-7.41). Only 6 Months to Resume Regular Exercise and 2% Chance of Reoperation ( < 0.05) significantly impacted treatment choice. When presented with fixed choice parameters, 50.5% of subjects preferred PAO and arthroscopy while 49.5% opted for arthroscopy alone. When no clear surgical treatment is indicated, patient preferences have an amplified role in patient decision-making. Our results confirm variation in attribute importance within treatments as well as treatment choice, highlighting the importance in understanding patient preferences in decision-making for FAIS in BHD. More patient-specific generalizable outcomes of surgical treatment options are needed in the literature.

摘要

对于在临界性髋关节发育不良(BHD)情况下出现股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)影像学证据的患者,手术治疗的决策仍然是一项挑战,因为目前文献中对于治疗方法尚无共识。当医学证据不明确时,了解患者偏好对于为每位患者确定最佳治疗方案尤为重要。本研究的目的是衡量患者确定的与BHD中FAIS手术治疗相关因素的重要性。对年龄在18 - 65岁、有髋关节疼痛且具有BHD形态(定义为外侧中心边缘角18 - 25度或Tonnis角10 - 15度)的患者进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE),该实验聚焦于不同治疗方案之间存在差异的属性:住院时间、主要并发症发生率、2年内需要再次手术的几率以及恢复常规锻炼的时间。此DCE用于计算治疗偏好、相对属性重要性和偏好权重。共有101名患者完整完成了DCE。最重要的属性(平均重要性权重,95%可信区间)是再次手术的几率(60.16,56.99 - 63.34),而最不重要的是住院时间(6.57,5.73 - 7.41)。仅恢复常规锻炼6个月和再次手术几率为2%(P < 0.05)对治疗选择有显著影响。当呈现固定的选择参数时,5​​0.5%的受试者倾向于骨盆髋臼截骨术(PAO)和关节镜检查,而49.5%的受试者仅选择关节镜检查。当未指明明确的手术治疗方法时,患者偏好在患者决策中具有更大作用。我们的结果证实了不同治疗方法以及治疗选择中属性重要性的差异,凸显了在BHD中FAIS决策过程中了解患者偏好的重要性。文献中需要更多针对患者的手术治疗方案的可推广结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/42fa3ab73927/hnae002f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/dfb02f09b2cd/hnae002f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/c05bc7aff2a3/hnae002f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/18cf122032c5/hnae002f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/42fa3ab73927/hnae002f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/dfb02f09b2cd/hnae002f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/c05bc7aff2a3/hnae002f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/18cf122032c5/hnae002f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5b/11631526/42fa3ab73927/hnae002f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision-making in borderline hip dysplasia and concomitant femoracetabular impingement syndrome: using a discrete choice experiment to explore patient preferences.边缘性髋关节发育不良合并股骨髋臼撞击综合征的决策:运用离散选择实验探索患者偏好
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Feb 1;11(3):167-175. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae002. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Outcomes of Flexibility Sport Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征后伴边缘型髋关节发育不良的灵活性运动运动员的结局:至少 2 年随访的倾向性匹配分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 May;52(6):1554-1562. doi: 10.1177/03635465241239874. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Return to Sport in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征后髋关节边缘性发育不良运动员重返运动的研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;50(1):30-39. doi: 10.1177/03635465211056082. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
4
Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术治疗髋关节发育不良边缘患者:一项至少 5 年随访的病例对照研究
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1616-1624. doi: 10.1177/0363546520916473. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Borderline Hip Dysplasia Is Not Associated With Significant Differences in Hip Survivorship or Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.边缘型髋关节发育不良与原发性髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征后髋关节生存率或患者报告结局的显著差异无关:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Apr;40(4):1177-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Outcome Scores and Survivorship of Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Propensity-Matched Study With Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.行初次髋关节镜手术治疗伴髋关节发育不良边缘患者的结局评分和生存情况:一项倾向性匹配研究,随访时间至少 10 年。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jun;52(7):1744-1752. doi: 10.1177/03635465241247287. Epub 2024 May 14.
7
Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术治疗髋关节发育不良边缘患者的临床疗效:一项至少 2 年随访的病例对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2636-2645. doi: 10.1177/0363546519865919. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?髋臼周围截骨术可改善外侧中心边缘角在 18° 和 25° 之间的患者的疼痛和功能,但这些髋关节真的属于边缘性发育不良吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000516.
9
Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up.在 2 年随访时,伴髋关节发育不良边缘患者行髋关节镜翻修术后的功能和临床结果。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3240-3247. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.019.
10
Clinical and Radiographic Criteria Define "Acceptable" Surgical Correction of Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome as Well as Postoperative Complications: An International Modified Delphi Study.临床和影像学标准界定了髋关节股骨髋臼撞击综合征“可接受”的手术矫正以及术后并发症:一项国际改良德尔菲研究。
Arthroscopy. 2023 May;39(5):1198-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.023. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy for borderline hip dysplasia in adolescent patients.青少年患者边缘性髋关节发育不良的髋臼周围截骨术的治疗结果。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Apr 2;7(2):249-255. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa012. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Patient Preferences for Surgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Evaluating Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.患者对膝关节骨关节炎手术治疗的偏好:一项评估全膝关节和单髁膝关节置换术的离散选择实验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Dec 2;102(23):2022-2031. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00132.
3
A Multicenter Study of Radiographic Measures Predicting Failure of Arthroscopy in Borderline Hip Dysplasia: Beware of the Tönnis Angle.
多中心研究:影像学指标预测髋关节发育不良边缘病例关节镜治疗失败:警惕 Tönnis 角。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1608-1615. doi: 10.1177/0363546520914942. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
4
A Contemporary Look at the Evaluation and Treatment of Adult Borderline and Frank Hip Dysplasia.成人边缘性和法兰克髋关节发育不良的评估和治疗的现代观点。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2314-2323. doi: 10.1177/0363546519881411. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
Clinical and radiographic predictors of failed hip arthroscopy in the management of dysplasia: a systematic review and proposal for classification.髋关节镜治疗发育不良失败的临床和影像学预测因素:系统评价及分类建议。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1296-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05416-3. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
Hip Dysplasia Compromises the Outcome of Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery.髋关节发育不良会影响股骨髋臼撞击症手术的疗效。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):852-856. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments.离散选择实验数据的内部有效性:一种用于定量评估的测试工具。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):157-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.876. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?髋臼周围截骨术可改善外侧中心边缘角在 18° 和 25° 之间的患者的疼痛和功能,但这些髋关节真的属于边缘性发育不良吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000516.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy from the Prospective ANCHOR Cohort Study.前瞻性ANCHOR队列研究中髋臼周围截骨术的患者报告结局
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 4;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00798.
10
Three Patterns of Acetabular Deficiency Are Common in Young Adult Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia.在患有髋臼发育不良的年轻成年患者中,髋臼缺损的三种模式很常见。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5150-3.