Lorenz Jonathan M
Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec 10;41(5):435-443. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791719. eCollection 2024 Oct.
When consulted for percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of abdominopelvic collections, interventional radiologists (IRs) should consider the appropriateness of this technique in the context of other options such as conservative, endoscopic, or surgical management. Whenever possible, published data should be considered prior to performing percutaneous drainage, especially as regards controversial scenarios such as the use of fibrinolytic therapy, the primary placement of large-bore drainage catheters, the drainage of cystic tumors, the drainage of splenic abscesses, and the treatment of collections lacking an in-line drainage window. This article examines past and present published data on PCD to dispel some common myths and guide IRs toward the best applications of PCD.
当被咨询关于经皮导管引流(PCD)治疗腹盆腔积液时,介入放射科医生(IRs)应在其他治疗选择(如保守治疗、内镜治疗或手术治疗)的背景下考虑该技术的适用性。只要有可能,在进行经皮引流之前应参考已发表的数据,特别是在一些有争议的情况下,如使用纤维蛋白溶解疗法、大口径引流导管的初次放置、囊性肿瘤的引流、脾脓肿的引流以及缺乏直接引流窗口的积液的治疗。本文回顾了过去和现在关于PCD的已发表数据,以消除一些常见的误解,并指导IRs实现PCD的最佳应用。